We are fighting a global war against international terrorists
because the terrorists are engaged in a global jihad against infidels. The
scariest thing about it is that a good many people in this country believe
we actually have the luxury of opting out.
Isn’t the operative assumption that we are dealing with a
reasonable enemy that doesn’t want war any more than we do?
Why else would Democratic congressman Martin Frost tell Fox
News – approvingly – that ”a majority of the American people has now
decided that it was a mistake for us to go into Iraq”? Why else would
certain media elites treat the ranting, spooky 18-page letter of Iranian
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad to President Bush as a thoughtful, serious
piece warranting the president’s good faith consideration? Ahmadinejad, by
the way, said on Aug. 3 that the solution to the Middle East crisis is to
Why else would the left be so quick to declare moral equivalence
between the actions of the Hezbollah terrorist aggressors and those of
Israeli defenders? Why else would the liberal media downplay Hezbollah’s
raining of over 200 rockets on potentially civilian targets in one day while
ignoring the possibility that the report of civilian deaths in Qana from
Israeli airstrikes was part of a terrorist-staged propaganda event? Doesn’t
the fact that terrorists traffic in lies as well as murder warrant
skepticism at least?
Why else would ”more than a third of the American public suspect
that federal officials assisted in the 9/11 terrorist attacks or took no
action to stop them so the United States could go to war in the Middle East”
(according to a new Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll)?
Why else would former U.S. ambassador to Iraq, Ed Peck (and
others) refuse to call Hezbollah a terrorist organization? ”A terrorist
organization,” said the diplomat, ”is in the eye of the beholder.” When
asked, point blank, whether Hezbollah was a terrorist organization, Peck
said, ”No, I think it has objectives to which we object very strongly, and
some of them are bloody. But other people are doing things quite similar to
that and they’re not called terrorists because they’re on our side.”
Yes, many in this country stubbornly believe the United States,
let alone Israel, is not an entirely innocent party in this war. They
believe, variously, that terrorists have legitimate grievances that can be
mollified through negotiation, that we can rectify those grievances by
altering our ”imperialistic” policies and that Muslim terrorists have a
right to be outraged that we attacked Iraq and had the audacity to help the
Iraqis establish a political system whereby they could choose their own
leaders instead of submitting to an unelected dictator.
They believe the terrorists have a right to be outraged at our
consistent support of the Israelis, which are no different from the
terrorists and allegedly have no greater claim to the Holy Land than the
Palestinians. They believe the Palestinians are victims who are willing to
live in peace with Israel if it will just cede a little more land, and a
little more land, and a little more land, and that the United States has no
moral authority in demanding the cessation of Iran’s nuclear weapons program
since we have the world’s most formidable nuclear arsenal ourselves. They
believe that if we hadn’t attacked Iraq, the terrorists wouldn’t be so mad
at us and might not be at war against us.
So what if they finally badger our policy makers into
withdrawing from Iraq before the Iraqi security forces are capable of
assuming the job themselves? Will this withdrawal make us less of a target
for the terrorists? Or will we have to withdraw our support for Israel as
well? Perhaps join the terrorists in attacking Israel? How about our
presence in Saudi Arabia?
The uncomplicated answer is that no matter what we do,
policy-wise, we will remain infidels with gigantic bull’s-eyes on our backs
unless we renounce our capitalistic ways, destroy our churches and
synagogues, outlaw our pluralistic religious society, convert to a radical
Islamic theocracy and join the global jihad en route to a worldwide
We are in this war for the long haul whether we like it or not.
The only question is whether we intend to fight it or roll over in shameful
appeasement until we are in a much weaker position to fight at such time as
even the appeasers realize we have no other choice.
Related special offer: