The 2nd District Court of Appeal in Los Angeles is scheduled to hear oral arguments Monday in the Rachel L. case, the startling ruling released in February in which the judges concluded there was no constitutional or statutory provision for parents to homeschool their children.
The case immediately sparked nationwide outrage, up to the White House and Congress, which approved a resolution calling for a rehearing, and the court panel's judges eventually scheduled new arguments in the dispute, effectively overturning their own earlier ruling.
Kevin Snider, chief counsel for the Pacific Justice Institute, is to argue the legality of homeschooling under both state law and constitutional law as a representative of the private Christian school that provided the overarching program in which the family participated.
Advertisement - story continues below
An estimated 166,000 children are being homeschooled in California, and their future also will be argued by Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation, who represents the father in the case, along with the Alliance Defense Fund.
TRENDING: A teaching moment
The Home School Legal Defense Association, the nation's premiere homeschooling advocacy organization, also has been assisting in preparation of the arguments, which will be in addition to the arguments from the various components of California's education industry, education agencies and teachers' unions.
"We are looking forward to this opportunity to defend the thousands of families who are making sacrifices to teach their children at home. The state should be applauding, not threatening, these families," said Brad Dacus, president of PJI.
Advertisement - story continues below
"We hope that the court reverses its decision and restores homeschool freedom to California," said Michael Farris, chairman of the HSLDA.
In 1925, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the rights of parents to oversee the education of their children, stating, "The fundamental theory of liberty upon which all governments in this Union repose excludes any general power of the state to standardize its children by forcing them to accept instruction from public teachers only. The child is not the mere creature of the state; those who nurture him and direct his destiny have the right, coupled with the high duty, to recognize and prepare him for additional obligations," according to Liberty Counsel, which also is working on the case.
The court's earlier opinion originated with a juvenile case, but concluded that parents without mandatory credentials from state agencies and teachers' unions do not have the right to school their children at home.
Liberty Counsel filed a brief on behalf of 19 members of Congress providing an overview of education laws in all 50 states.
![]() Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger |
Advertisement - story continues below
In another brief, filed on behalf of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr. argued that there's no need to dig into state constitutional issues regarding homeschooling since state laws already provide for that choice for parents.
"Here, this court need not reach any constitutional issues because this petition can be decided entirely on statutory grounds," the brief said. "The Education Code provides a broad statutory basis for homeschooling in California, setting forth three different avenues through which parents may legally homeschool their children."
The brief said the trial court in the case at hand "addressed only the constitutional issues, it never considered the preliminary question of whether the parents had met the statutory requirements for homeschooling under the Education Act."
WND broke the story in February when the original decision was released, and has reported on the various briefs as they have been filed.
Advertisement - story continues below
Since the case originated with a juvenile court proceeding, some of the arguments and briefs have remained confidential, because of the standard for handling juvenile proceedings. Other briefs have been released publicly.
"HSLDA has also filed a friend-of-the-court brief in conjunction with Focus on the Family and Family Protection Ministries to show the benefits of a home education. These arguments draw on the extensive development of homeschooling and the successful track record of parents educating their children at home," the organization said.
The original opinion was written by Appeals Court Judge H. Walt Croskey and said: "We find no reason to strike down the
Legislature's evaluation of what constitutes an adequate education scheme sufficient to promote the 'general diffusion of
knowledge and intelligence. … We agree … 'the educational program of the State of California was designed to
promote the general welfare of all the people and was not designed to accommodate the personal ideas of any individual in the
field of education.'"
Homeschool advocates immediately expressed concern the original ruling would leave parents who educate their children
at home liable criminally as well as open to civil charges for child neglect that could create the potential for fines, court-ordered counseling or even loss of custody.
Advertisement - story continues below
The original California opinion arose from a dependency case brought in juvenile court. In the process, attorneys assigned by the
court to the family's two younger children sought a court order for them to be enrolled in a public or qualifying private
school.
The district court denied the request citing parental rights, but the appellate court overturned the decision and granted the
attorneys' request. The appeals court concluded the parents held neither a statutory right nor a constitutional
right to provide homeschooling to their own children.
Advertisement - story continues below
"The Little Book of Big Reasons to
Homeschool"
Advertisement - story continues below
Teachers union to decide fate of
homeschooling?
California homeschooling gets 2nd
chance
Advertisement - story continues below
Appeals of homeschooling threat being
watched
Students have their say about California
homeschooling
Petition seeks rehearing in
homeschooling case
Congress outraged by California
homeschool case
Advertisement - story continues below
'Perfect storm' hits California
parents
2nd petition opposes homeschooling
ban
Lawmaker: Reject homeschooling
opinion
Gov. Arnold blasts homeschool
ruling
Advertisement - story continues below
Ruling threatens custody of homeschool
kids
Parents of 166,000 students could face
criminal charges
Court's homeschool ban creating
'panic'
Judge orders homeschoolers into
government education
Advertisement - story continues below
California ripped as 'too queer for
school'
'Mom,' 'dad,' banned; now 600,000
students could go
'Mom' and 'Dad' banished from
California
PTA endorses demand to show 'gays'
positively
Advertisement - story continues below
'Mom,' 'dad,' targeted by California bias
ban
Parents ask court to stop 'gay'
indoctrination
Telling kids homosexuality 'innate'
challenged
People born homosexual, say local school
officials
Advertisement - story continues below
Ban on 'mom' and 'dad' considered –
again
Parents who spank being made
criminals
'Spanking-ban plan threatens parental
rights'
California plan would criminalize
spanking
Advertisement - story continues below
Californian proposes jail time for
spanking
2 more 'sexual indoctrination' bills
vetoed
State education chief pushes 'gay'
pornfest
Wrist slap for 'Have sex, take drugs' school
seminar
Advertisement - story continues below
We blew sex seminar, school chief
says
'Have sex, do drugs,' speaker tells
students