'Beer summit' should have been about freedom

President Obama billed his White House "beer summit" to discuss the altercation between the black Harvard professor and the white policeman as a "teachable moment."

But, unfortunately, I'd doubt that the real lesson to be learned ever came up over beer and pretzels.

Can we appreciate that what seems to be an endless conversation about race in America is really a conversation about America, period?

I wish I could believe that the conversation in the White House garden was about the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution of the United States. That they talked about "self evident" truths and that the role of government, as our founders laid out so clearly, is to protect individual freedom.

Tell Congress to stop spending America into the ground! Sign the WND petition demanding lawmakers stop the bailouts, stimulus bills and march toward socialism and national destruction.

TRENDING: Poll: Stunning number say Biden suffers 'cognitive ailment'

Or that they discussed the struggles we've had because when America's founders signed those documents containing those great truths 20 percent of our population were black slaves.

The civil rights movement was supposed to be about the proper inclusion, once and for all, of blacks in this great arrangement. The sad irony was, and is, that the movement transformed into a proponent of expanding the very arbitrary political power that we are supposed to be protecting ourselves from. And Professor Gates has been actively involved in this process.

A black law student quoted in a Wall Street Journal story about the meeting touched the heart of the matter. She correctly called it a "trivialization," reducing it all to personal relations rather than being "about abuses of power."

One would be hard pressed to find a black American who is not concerned, often from personal experience, about being personally violated as a result of arbitrarily exercised authority and power.

Read the Declaration of Independence. Protecting individual liberty against such arbitrary power was and is what it's all about.

So why do blacks, who have more personal experience than any other group in this nation with abuses of such power, consistently support expanding it?

Why is Professor Gates freaked out by the policeman standing on his porch but not by the intrusive expansion of government into his life and the lives of every other American, white or black?

Why does he hate a policeman entering his living room, but he'll support government stepping inside his family, and every American family, and taxing their estate, so that parents cannot pass the wealth that they worked all their lives to accumulate freely on to their children?

Why is he not freaked out by government telling parents where they can send their child to school, government determining what that child will learn and government transmitting to young children in school politically defined values about life, family, and sexual behavior?

And why is Professor Gates not appalled that politicians can huddle in Washington and arbitrarily decide whose property they will tax or take for the purposes of their own political objectives?

The purpose of the press conference where Obama was asked about the incident in Cambridge was about his answering questions regarding the massive government takeover of private American lives he is engineering with his health care proposal. A proposal where government will dictate how we get our health care, what health care we will get and put life and death in the hands of bureaucrats.

Christian theologian R.C. Sproul has warned against statism in which "government is viewed not only as the final ruling authority but as the ultimate agency of redemption."

Blacks and all Americans must be concerned about government arbitrarily violating their freedom. Whether on Professor Gates' porch or in Washington, D.C.