An amendment of the Massachusetts Constitution proposed by Democrats could virtually put an end to citizen-initiated referenda in the state.
The amendment, proposed jointly by state Rep. Byron Rushing in the House and by state Sen. Cynthia Stone Creem in the Senate, would exclude any citizen petition that deals with issues concerning a person’s right to “the enjoyment of life, liberty and property, according to standing laws.”
Massachusetts Family Association President Kris Mineau opposes the amendment, asserting it would have a chilling effect on the people of Massachusetts.
Get the instructions for the making and maintenance of the United States: the Constitution!
“If the amendment passes the legislature and it goes all the way through, it would virtually eliminate the citizen’s right to petition in Massachusetts,” Mineau said.
“Oh yes, life, liberty or property. I can’t think of a single piece of legislation that doesn’t affect life, liberty or property in some way,” Mineau added.
Mineau believes there’s a deeper reason for the proposal.
“It’s absolutely the objective of the amendment’s sponsors to shut out the voters. Again, this would be a disenfranchisement of the citizens. They don’t believe we’re sophisticated enough to make decisions that only the elite elected officials are,” Mineau stated.
“That’s why this November’s election is so critical, both in the nation and in the commonwealth (of Massachusetts),” Mineau observed.
Although it was stated nowhere specifically, the change would appear to prevent any family issues from being brought to voters, such as a constitutional amendment that marriage is limited to one man and one woman, as dozens of states already have done.
Republican state Sen. Richard Ross, who won the special election to fill U.S. Sen. Scott Brown’s statehouse seat, says he’s opposed to the amendment.
“The people should have the right to have the initiative petition, and I’ve been a supporter of the petition process in the past,” Ross said.
State Rep. Brad Hill also says he supports citizen petitions.
One of the opponents is House Minority Leader Brad Jones. The Republican state representative believes the proposal is done.
“It’s a ridiculous proposal, and it’s not going anywhere,” Jones said.
The measure has solid support, however. Senate Bill 23 received only one dissenting vote and was reported out of the Legislature’s Joint Judiciary Committee with an “ought to pass” recommendation.
The amendment states, “No proposition inconsistent with any one of the following rights of the individual, as at present declared in the declaration of rights … shall be the subject of an initiative or referendum petition.”
Rushing and Creem were unavailable for comment, and the current constitutional-convention meetings have been adjourned. A clerk’s office source in the state Senate said no date has been scheduled for another meeting.
But Mineau warns the issue isn’t finished.
“It’s not going to go away. It will be back. The ruling elite don’t believe we’re smart enough to decide anything for ourselves, so no, it’s not dead,” Mineau said.
Related offers:
Get the instructions for the making and maintenance of the United States: the Constitution!
“The Gay Agenda: It’s Dividing the Family, the Church, and a Nation”
“See how Americans and their Constitution have been betrayed by judge-made law”
Previous stories:
Will death threats by ‘gays’ convince judges?
Justices deciding whether Christians deserve bull’s-eye
Vote for marriage? You’re on a hit list
Voted for Prop 8? You’re fired
Talk show terminated after Prop 8 discussion
Supremes to review ‘gay’ lawsuits against Prop. 8
Watch church lady meet same-sex ‘marriage’ protesters
Watch sparks fly as ‘gay’ activist mob swarms Christians
‘Gays’ demand endorsement of lifestyle
‘Gay’ threats target Christians over same-sex ‘marriage’ ban
School holds surprise ‘Gay’ Day for kindergartners
School takes 1st–graders to see lesbian teacher wed
‘Gay’ marriage battle goes to kindergarten
‘Bride,’ ‘groom’ can’t marry in California
County surrenders in same-sex marriage war
Counties to Supreme Court on ‘gay’ marriage: Drop dead
‘Gay’ rights group to Supremes: Don’t let people vote
It’s voters vs. black robes in November
County clerks urged to ignore same-sex marriage ruling
‘Gay’ marriage ruling to spark lawsuits nationwide
Whoa! Marriage laws aren’t changed – yet
Supremes asked to give voters a chance
City clerk suing not to wed ‘gays’
California battle over same-sex marriage not over
Black robes trash traditional marriage
California’s ‘judicial fiat’ condemned – by judge
Plan pushes for last step in eliminating marriage
Court asked to protect 1-man, 1-woman marriage
Pro-marriage groups: ‘Don’t trust courts!’
Gov. Arnold ‘terminates’ man-and-woman marriage plan
Gov. Arnold says ‘marriage’ can be terminated
California handing out marriage privileges
‘Marriage’ to become museum piece
Homosexual marriage minces west to California
Court will decide if California voters were right
Vote or pay us damages, group tells lawmakers
7 more states say no to ‘gay marriage’
Same-sex rulings will ‘echo’ across U.S.
Senate rejects ‘gay marriage’ ban
California Senate OKs ‘gay’ marriage
Mayor faces trial for same-sex marriages
60% of polled Americans: No homosexual marriage
It’s ‘gay’ marriage in Massachusetts
Poll: Massachusetts opposes ‘gay’ marriage
‘Gay’ marriage ruling’s consequences ‘dire’
‘Gay’ marriage ban struck down in Massachusetts
Poll suggests backlash on ‘gay’ issues
Court strikes down Texas sodomy law
