House Speaker John Boehner

WASHINGTON – Who says you can’t fix Washington’s overspending problems, inattention to constitutional limits on power and political pet programs like funding of left-wing media and the biggest abortion provider in the world?

There’s one bill that will be voted on soon in Washington that could bring an end to it all, says the organizer of a national grass-roots lobbying campaign catching fire, and only House Republicans are needed to make it a reality.

“We’re talking about the most important piece of legislation in the nation’s capital in decades,” says WND founder Joseph Farah, who organized the “No More Red Ink” campaign to defeat efforts to raise the debt limit and force a 40 percent contraction of federal spending this year. “This is the tactical nuclear weapon that Republicans and Republicans alone can wield this year to rid the budget of every unconstitutional program and department and agency in one fell swoop.”

Shock the Washington establishment by participating in the “No More Red Ink” campaign and shut down all new plans for bailouts, “stimulus” spending and even the funding for Obamacare.

More and more Republican leaders are embracing the plan – from Sarah Palin to Tim Pawlenty to the largest tea party organization in the country, Farah says. But it’s the House Republicans who need to be persuaded.

“The biggest vote, most important vote, they will cast this year is on the question of whether to raise the debt limit because the new majority in the lower house can, by inaction alone, force the most dramatic spending cuts in American history,” says Farah.

And that’s what the “No More Red Ink” campaign is designed to do – flood House Republicans with hundreds of thousands – perhaps millions – of red letters making the case for an end to the borrow-and-spend cycle that everyone agrees is unsustainable.

So far, more than 350,000 letters have been sent to House Republicans through the “No More Red Ink” campaign. Farah’s goal is to exceed 1 million before a bill authorizing a hike in the debt limit reaches the floor.

While the latest poll shows 70 percent of Americans opposed to raising the debt limit, House Speaker John Boehner has signaled his intent to push for it – surrendering, Farah says, the only weapon Republicans have that can force cuts beyond those that will be accepted by the Democrat-dominated Senate and Barack Obama.

Rep. Michael Burgess, R-Texas, is another member to publicly oppose the move.

“Voting to expand the limit is a bad idea,” he told WND. “I must be convinced we have wrung every nickel of spending out of this. Even then you are correct, this is the one tool available to us, and unilateral disarmament leads to financial Armageddon.”

Burgess joins Reps. Michelle Bachmann, R-Minn., Ron Paul, R-Texas, Anthony Weiner, D-N.Y., and others who publicly oppose raising the debt limit. It takes only 218 votes in the House to block the move, and Republicans control 241 votes.

“This campaign is now getting help from tea party activists across the country,” Farah said. “We’re getting lots of support from Republicans in the House who don’t approve of their leadership’s concession on this issue. This is about to explode on the nation as the most important vote Congress will hold this year or any year – one that can completely break the chain of business as usual in Washington.”

Farah’s plan empowers American citizens to send messages to every member of the House Republican caucus inexpensively and efficiently – with guaranteed delivery by Fed Ex.

“Unfortunately, if the House Republicans do not hear from the American people in strength, they will vote for business-as-usual deficit spending for the next two years and surrender the power they have to force fiscal responsibility on Barack Obama and the Democrats in the Senate,” says Farah. “House Speaker John Boehner says he wants to use the debt limit to wrangle concessions out of the Democrats, but when he signals, as he did last weekend, that Congress must raise the debt limit to keep the government solvent, he has already waved the white flag of surrender on the most important vote to be cast in Congress over the next two years.”

The House Republican leadership says it will trade a hike in the debt limit for a promise by Obama and the Democrats to cut the budget.

“I don’t understand this?” says Farah. “If you are holding a winning hand, why fold? Why trade away the power you have to force the first real cuts in the budget and the end of deficit spending for yet another promise that will not be kept?”

For his part, Farah has made it easy for the public to make their voices heard in Washington in a powerful way.

The “No More Red Ink” campaign has two facets:

“This is a plan to separate the real economic conservatives from the pretenders,” said Farah. “If you want to reduce the debt that is destroying this country’s economy we have a chance right now to slam on the brakes. Once the debt limit is raised, it’s back to business as usual.”

Republicans in the House hold all the cards, Farah points out, because of their majority. They don’t need a single Democratic vote to side with them to shut down borrowing.

“At that point, Barack Obama can’t implement Obamacare,” he said. “From that moment onward, there will be no more spending initiatives by Obama for the next two years. There will be no more bailouts, no more ‘stimulus’ spending. It’s all over. In fact, the most significant budget cuts in modern American history will have to be made – and the Republican House will still have to approve them.”

The “No More Red Ink” campaign allows Americans to send a “red ink” letter to every member of the House majority urging them to vote “no” on raising the debt limit. The letters are individually addressed to each member, with guaranteed delivery by Fed Ex for a cost of just $29.99. It would cost an individual more than $100 in postage alone to send the 241 letters with no guarantee of delivery and certainly nowhere near the impact.

A similar campaign organized by WND last year delivered more than 9 million “pink slips” to members of the House and Senate. Farah is hoping a similar response by Americans in the next few weeks will persuade House Republicans to oppose raising the debt limit.

“When we started this campaign three weeks ago, almost no one was talking about freezing the debt limit,” he said. “Few Americans understood what a powerful weapon the House Republicans had in their hands. Now the pressure is mounting on those who were elected in November promising an end to business as usual in Washington.

That’s exactly what the debt-limit vote is all about – whether Washington is going to continue borrowing and overspending or whether new leadership will exert fiscal responsibility beginning this year.”

Farah predicts this will soon become the biggest issue in the nation – something that everyone is talking about.

“This is the moment to join this campaign and shake up the Washington borrowing-and-spending machine like it has never been shaken up before,” he said. “Remind the Republicans in the House why they were elected to lead.”

Shock the Washington establishment by participating in the “No More Red Ink” campaign and shut down all new plans for bailouts, “stimulus” spending and even the funding for Obamacare.

Previous reports:

Tea Party joins opposition to raising debt limit

Another House Repub joins no-more-borrowing club

‘Obamacare can be killed without single Democrat vote’

‘We’re winning biggest congressional battle of decade’

70 percent of Americans oppose raising debt limit

87 House Repubs promised opposition to raising debt limit

‘Don’t let House Republicans wimp out on promises’

Feds change guess on debt ceiling ‘crisis’

Keyes attacks House Repubs for capitulation on debt

Debt or alive: Obama ‘pushing panic button’

Republicans about to betray November shellacking?

Secret weapon unveiled to slay dragon of Obama’s scheming

Remember ‘pink slips’? Now it’s red ink slips

How Republican House can dry up red ink with 1 vote

‘House Republicans alone can downsize Washington’

The Republicans’ nuclear option

Oxymoron: ‘Fiscal conservative’

Note: Read our discussion guidelines before commenting.