Last week in Part 1, I discussed how Wall Street Occupiers are being directly aided by the mainstream media, or MSM, and indirectly aided by White House stimulus monies as well as Mayor Bloomberg and even Vice President Biden’s households. I also detailed how the MSM are accelerating their progressive blitz, not only to hasten the second coming or election of President Obama, but also to help him and other progressives in reaching their final goal of “fundamentally transforming the United States of America.”

Similarly, I believe the MSM are also bent to coronate a particular GOP candidate who they feel can most easily be beaten by President Obama. I believe that candidate is Gov. Mitt Romney, for the sole fact that the powers behind the MSM believe his presidential run will fracture conservative parties, create a third-party candidate run and split the GOP vote just like it did in 1992 with Ross Perot and 1996 with Bob Dole. Finally, they believe there is little hope Romney will sway tea partiers, conservatives and evangelicals, which, in the end, will easily allow President Obama to slide back into the Oval Office with the majority vote.


With still two months away before the Iowa caucuses and three top-tiered candidates vying for the GOP nomination, should Mitt Romney become the GOP nominee, as the MSM and the White House believe? I pray that what they believe will not be the case.

President Obama himself is only a pawn in the parade of progressivism. And behind the White House and MSM curtains are power-broker progressives and globalists like George Soros, who are wielding their finances and pulling the strings in more than 30 major puppet networks, including the New York Times, the Associated Press, Washington Post, NBC and ABC.

And those progressive agents are at it again right now in the series of GOP presidential debates. Does anyone really believe questions coming from MSM moderators aren’t ultimately asked, first, to trip up the candidates and then, second, to elevate and orchestrate the re-election of their furor? The entire debate system should be derailed from the MSM and played out exclusively on C-SPAN with questions being fed in via the Internet from people around the 50 states.

Soros is even spreading his dominion to control states’ voting processes. Bubbling up in the progressive boiler for months has been the state of Wisconsin, which the New York Times called “a swing state in more ways than one.” researchers actually just confessed a week ago that they couldn’t verify the report that Soros held a “significant ownership stake” in the companies that are tabulating the electronic votes in Wisconsin, but what about a “partial” ownership stake?

What we can document for certain is that Media Trackers, a “non-profit, non-partisan investigative watchdog dedicated to promoting accountability in the media and government across Wisconsin,” discovered that Soros and his Open Society is financing the new Wisconsin website, allegedly designed to draw “back the curtain on how money influences legislation around the issues that people care most about.” Right. Draw back the curtain? Like a voting curtain? Interesting terminology. is the 15th organization in Wisconsin financed by Soros’ grants!

But those progressive political connections are all just coincidental, conspiratorial and inconsequential, too, right? And I suppose Soros’ five visits to the White House were only to hang out in the Rose Garden and sip Obama’s new beer? More likely, they were talking about the implementation of Agenda 21, a United Nations program launched in 1992 for the nebulous purpose of reaching global “sustainable development,” but which actually promotes a European socialist system that will chip away our freedoms, liberties and rights.

At the heart of that global and social change agenda is the use of non-governmental organizations, civil resistant movements and class warfare protests, just like we saw last Thursday with Occupy’s “Day of Action” in New York and vow to shut down Wall Street. One major Occupy website even embraces Agenda 21 as the agenda for their movement!

Indeed, the MSM have fueled the Occupy protests by broadcasting its every move for thousands of hours, exaggerating its expansion and even condoning and minimizing the violent acts of occupiers. Though at least 12 New York police officers were injured, including a hand laceration and eye injury, the MSM insinuated law enforcement exaggeration noting that they were merely “reported injured.” MSNBC even jumbled the number of injured law officers, appearing to place a numerical emphasis on injured Occupiers: “seven police officers and 10 protesters were injured. Five other officers were treated after being hit in the face with stinging liquid.”

Bottom line, these Occupy protests are nothing short of plays taken straight from the playbook of another Chicago progressive, Saul Alinsky, who pioneered civil disobedience in his “Rules for Radicals.” In it, Alinsky plotted, “The job of the organizer is to maneuver and bait the establishment so that it will publicly attack him as a ‘dangerous enemy’ … The organizer dedicated to changing the life of a particular community must first rub raw the resentments of the people of the community; fan the latent hostilities of many of the people to the point of overt expression.”

But do Americans really want to get their social marching orders from a book that was dedicated to the “first radical” himself, Lucifer? No joke. Alinsky wrote, “Lest we forget at least an over-the-shoulder acknowledgement to the very first radical … the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom – Lucifer.”

You’ve got to hand it to progressives in the success of implementing their plan and erecting their kingdom. Take over the institutions of higher education, indoctrinate our youth, then commission them into key areas like journalism, government and teaching, where they can feed the progressive machine via media networks, politics and public schools, creating minions for the next generation.

(In Part 3, I will not only address exactly what is the end goal and meaning of progressives’ “total transformation of the United States of America,” but I will also discuss what I and America’s founders believe we can do to stop that onslaught from overturning of our republic.)

Note: Read our discussion guidelines before commenting.