By Phil Kent

A recent front-page Wall Street Journal headline jarringly declared: “Record bankruptcy for Detroit: Motor City is ‘broke,’ governor says, as it seeks to restructure $18 billion in debt.”

Then came a similar headline from the Aug. 6 Breitbart News: “Rahm’s Chicago: $1 billion financial shortfall forecast by 2015.”

Detroit and Chicago certainly are not the only big cities in dire financial straits. An Aug. 5 CNBC report studied the nation’s troubled big cities and found a common denominator: Too much debt and too generous public pensions.

The next day the Journal’s Stephen Moore specified 20 major decaying cities facing financial ruin and how Chapter 11 bankruptcy appears to be the only option to press the reset button and wipe the slate clean.

But a small town in Georgia has developed what could serve as a model for municipal government to provide services to citizens at a cost they actually can afford.

Oliver Porter – a lecturer and consultant with an engineering background, an apostle of free market economics and the first interim city manager for Sandy Springs, Ga. – explained how it was done.

First, some history. Sandy Springs became a city in 2005 through a popular vote referendum. The new mayor, Eva Galambos, a retired economist, worked with the city council to quickly launched what Porter calls the first American city that “outsourced almost everything.”

Why are most of America’s big cities strongly liberal, while virtually the rest of the country leans conservative? Find out in this jaw-dropping WND special report, “URBAN WARFARE: How the left has destroyed America’s greatest cities.”

Eight years later, the city of 100,000 people boasts new roads, more neighborhood sidewalks, a state-of-the-art traffic system and award-winning parks. All of it has occurred with no tax increases – even as major capital improvements have been funded.

Before cityhood, Sandy Springs was part of unincorporated Fulton County, and residents were poorly policed while paying high taxes for few services.

“In June 2005 we had to find vendors for public services, and we had to have them in place when the city began on December 1,” Porter remembers. “I don’t know what you would do if you had to have public services in six months, but (shopping around with private vendors) is what I did.”

He bid out 12 main services to companies that often outsourced to smaller vendors. When certain guarantees couldn’t be met, the city chose someone else.

“In the contracts,” he said, “the companies providing the services had to pledge to have a live person answer phone calls and emails 24 hours a day, seven days a week. They also had to commit to responding to a problem within 48 hours – and the appropriate elected council member is kept in the loop with the progress of the work order or issue.”

Porter further explained the public-private model.

“The key is writing the contracts well,” he said. ‘But there is incentive for the companies because if they screw up, we can use someone else. That doesn’t happen in government. It is also essential that a cost-benefit analysis be done with each contract.”

Sandy Springs, he said, “outsources everything with the exception of public safety, mainly because of liability issues.”

“However, police officers and firefighters are on 401(k), defined contribution plans, not pension programs. The city owns no buildings – not even city hall— and little equipment, which means it doesn’t have to worry about depreciation on property or assets. So the city has no long-term liabilities.”

He said the Sandy Springs example is catching on in Georgia, with five other cities now following the model and others, including counties, considering or opting for more privatization of services.

The model is also capturing national attention.

“In recent years,” he said, “I’ve been increasingly asked to give advice and lectures around the country, especially in regard to Detroit’s problems. Bloated government and pension obligations have pushed many cities to the brink and more politicians are being forced to look at what Sandy Springs has done.”

Porter also looks at larger vistas: “This is also an international model.”

In this vein, he tells of his travels to meet city officials and government ministers of countries ranging from Britain, Iceland and Japan to Latin American nations and even the former Soviet republic Georgia.

“The big cities in trouble need to be looking at this model,” he said, “but the big obstacle is politics because local officials all too often aren’t willing to consider alternatives because they were elected under one system and they are afraid to look at other models even if they are more efficient and cost-effective.

“I tell every city official I meet: ‘Your main job is not to supply jobs – it is to serve taxpayers.'”

The city’s success has been cited by the New York Times, which said: “To grasp how unusual this is, consider what Sandy Springs does not have. It does not have a fleet of vehicles for road repair, or a yard where the fleet is parked. It does not have long-term debt. It has no pension obligations. It does not have a city hall, for that matter, if your idea of a city hall is a building owned by the city. Sandy Springs rents. The town does have a conventional police force and fire department, in part because the insurance premiums for a private company providing those services were deemed prohibitively high. But its 911 dispatch center is operated by a private company, iXP, with headquarters in Cranbury, N.J.”

WND CEO Joseph Farah wrote in a recent column: “Many cities have experimented with outsourcing, but none has taken it as far as Sandy Springs. Even the Times, normally a bleeding heart voice for expansion of government, admits there is nothing amiss about Sandy Springs, which hints it’s one of the ‘purest examples of a contract city.’ Everything works just fine. And it’s been like this since the town incorporated in 2005.”

Phil Kent is a media consultant, a pundit on Atlanta’s WAGA-TV’s “The Georgia Gang” and a resident of Sandy Springs, Ga.

Note: Read our discussion guidelines before commenting.