- WND - http://www.wnd.com -

He said, she said: Hillary vs. Akin

Hillary Clinton

WASHINGTON – Hillary Clinton apparently didn’t like a challenge from Todd Akin that she “de-legitimized” a 12-year-old rape victim’s claim in defense of a perpetrator she knew to be guilty as charged, as reported in the London Daily Mail Wednesday.

So she fired back in a retort to Politico Thursday through her rapid-response team: “Nobody should take advice from Todd Akin on women’s rights following his opposition to equal pay laws, his opposition to choice and opposition to rape protection laws, and his belief that women’s bodies ‘shut down’ during ‘legitimate rape’ to block unwanted pregnancy,” said communications director Adrienne Elrod.

Akin, a member of the House from Missouri who was attacked for a comment about “legitimate rape” during a 2012 campaign for the U.S. Senate, quickly responded in kind.

“It is curious to see that the Clinton camp chose to assassinate my character rather than to address my basic charge,” he told WND. “It is not so much that Hillary Clinton defended a child rapist – lawyers are required sometimes to do those things. But how can Ms. Clinton say she is for women’s rights when she laughed her way through an interview about getting a man she knew to be guilty off the hook for raping a 12-year-old?”

Akin, author of the upcoming book, “Firing Back: Taking on the party Bosses and Media Elite to Protect Our Faith and Freedom,” continued: “Hillary’s indifference to a female victim was not an aberration but the beginning of a pattern. So was the strategy of attacking her accusers. How can Ms. Clinton say she is for women’s rights when she hired private investigators to threaten women who had been involved sexually with her husband or who had been physically assaulted by him? If Hillary really cared about women’s rights, it was not obvious to Sally Perdue, who was threatened with the disfigurement of her ‘pretty little legs,’ or Kathleen Willey, whose cat’s head was severed to silence her.”

In the interview with Daily Mail, Akin attacked the former secretary of state and senator for chuckling in a recorded interview about her defense of the child rapist in 1975 during her career as an Arkansas lawyer: “It is incredibly hypocritical that Hillary Clinton would carry on about an imagined ‘Republican war on women’ when she once got a child rapist off the hook who she knew to be guilty, and laughed about how she did it when interviewed.”

The interview took place in 1980, and recordings were recently unearthed at the Clinton Library in Little Rock. She conceded in that recording to seizing on loopholes to minimize the sentence of the man accused of raping a 12-year-old girl. Heard laughing in the recording, Clinton said the polygraph test her client managed to pass “forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs.”

Akin tasked the media with making clear that “liberal Democrats like Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton are the true perpetrators of the ‘war on women.'” He added that by laughing while discussing the case, Clinton “de-legitimized the legitimate claims of the 12-year-old victim,” and that she “slandered the victim to justify her tactics.”

In his interview Wednesday, Akin lamented the “media firestorm” he faced, dismissing the inflammatory remark as “an unclear comment.” He deals with the controversy more in-depth in his book, “Firing Back: Taking on the Party Bosses and Media Elite to Protect Our Faith and Freedom,” which is due in stores July 15.

Akin had more to say about Hillary’s response: “The Clinton camp accused me of being opposed to ‘choice,’ and that is true. But how can Ms. Clinton say she is for women’s rights when she has sat silently while as many 28 million unborn American females were killed in their mothers’ wombs without any ‘choice’ on their part at all?

“Finally, if I can address the transparently false notion advanced both by Politico and the Clinton camp that I claimed victims of rape were unable to get pregnant,” Akin added. “No one knew the opposite to be true better than I. Children conceived in rape helped with my campaign. Did they help Ms. Clinton? All I said was that the stress of rape made pregnancy less likely, and I stand by that today. Like every conservative, I think rape an extremely serious crime and the rape of a minor even more appalling. Would the Clinton people please tell the media why Hillary thought the rape of a 12-year-old was a laughing matter? They did not address this issue in their initial response.”

WND reported Thursday that while two new fertility studies showing stress in males and females inhibits pregnancy have received worldwide attention, no one, to date, has linked them with the biggest U.S. political controversy of 2012 – Akin’s suggestion that pregnancy as a result of rape is rare.

When asked in a local television interview in August 2012 whether he would support abortion in the case of rape, Akin made the following statement, which led to a firestorm of criticism, denunciation and ridicule by many even in his own party, including presidential candidate Mitt Romney: “If it’s a legitimate rape, the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down. But let’s assume that maybe that didn’t work or something. You know, I think there should be some punishment, but the punishment ought to be on the rapist and not attacking the child.”

See Akin’s comments:

Akin’s statement was attacked on two premises:

Akin takes on the first point in “Firing Back” by saying: “When a woman claims to have been raped, the police determine if the evidence supports the legal definition of ‘rape.’ Is it a legitimate claim of rape or an excuse to avoid an unwanted pregnancy? Are the police warranted to take action against a crime or not? In short, the word ‘legitimate’ modifies the claim and not the action. There have been women who have lied about being raped, as Norman McCorvey did before the U.S. Supreme Court. The infamous Roe v. Wade decision of 1972 was based on a lie.”

On the second point, Akin writes: “My comment about a woman’s body shutting the pregnancy down was directed to the impact of stress on fertilization. This is something fertility doctors debate and discuss. Doubt me? Google ‘stress and fertilization,’ and you will find a library of research on the subject. The research is not conclusive, but there is considerable evidence that stress makes conception more difficult. And what could be more stressful than a rape?”

Akin also goes on to say that his critics twisted his remarks to suggest he was denying the possibility of pregnancy from forcible rape.

“In fact, several fantastic young Americans who campaigned with me were themselves the products of rape,” he writes. “And they were thankful I would stand with them.”

Is Akin right that pregnancy seldom results from rape?

There’s not much doubt about it. The studies pointing to the highest incidence suggest no more than 5 percent of rape victims become pregnant as a result of the attack. Many others suggest much lower numbers.

While Akin’s comments were dominating the news cycle in August 2012, the Los Angeles Times assigned reporter Kim Geiger to look into the question.

“Surprisingly few hard facts and figures were available about the prevalence of rape-related pregnancies,” she wrote. “Many news outlets, including this one, cited a 1996 study published in the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, which estimated that more than 23,000 women experience a rape-related pregnancy each year. The report also concluded that 5 percent of rape victims become pregnant, which would mean that 640,000 rapes occur each year.

“But that figure doesn’t jibe with other reputable sources. For example, FBI data show that 95,769 forcible rapes were reported in 1996. The 2005 National Crime Victimization Survey calculates that 64,080 rapes occurred in 2004 and 2005,” she reported.

Yet, that seemingly questionable study in 1996 has formed the basis for many reports on the number of rapes that take place in America annually, the number of pregnancies that result and the percentage of rapes that result in pregnancy – all based on the assumption that pregnancies result from rape as often as they do from non-forcible sex acts.

In fact, no one knows how many pregnancies result from rape because no one is keeping records. But applying the 5 percent estimate to the 64,080 figure of rapes in 2004 and 2005 brings the pregnancy estimate down to 3,204, the figure used by the Justice Department’s 2005 National Crime Victimization Survey. Still, it’s only an estimate based on an assumption that pregnancy results from rape at the same rate as non-coercive sex.

However, new studies released on the fertility of men and woman suggest stress could greatly reduce the incidence of pregnancy.

Psychological stress may degrade sperm quality and sperm fertility, according to a study published May 29, 2014, in the journal Fertility and Sterility.

“Men who feel stressed are more likely to have lower concentrations of sperm in their ejaculate, and the sperm they have are more likely to be misshapen or have impaired motility,” said researcher Pam Factor-Litvak, an epidemiologist at Columbia’s Mailman School of Public Health, in a statement. “These deficits could be associated with fertility problems.”

While the study did not specifically address the question of rape, it begs the question asked rhetorically by Todd Akin: “And what could be more stressful than a rape?”

But Akin’s controversial comment in 2012 did not address the role of male fertility, but rather female fertility – the idea that “the female body has ways to try to shut that whole thing down.”

Indeed other fertility studies this year might lend support to that claim.

These studies were all widely reported in 2014, but no one mentioned the bruising Akin had received for making a similar point in 2012 – again, arguably the biggest controversy of the election year. Previous stress-pregnancy studies, conducted over many years, have produced similar results, as Akin notes in his book.

Akin hasn’t given an interview to the media in 18 months. But he has broken that silence with the release of “Firing Back” July 15.

Todd Akin

What else does he have to say? Akin, commended in a foreword to the book written by Mike Huckabee for never resorting to ad hominem attacks on his political opponents, does not shy away from defending himself in “Firing Back”:

For Akin, government doesn’t have all the answers. But he truly believes there are answers to be found – or, perhaps, rediscovered.

“True freedom builds from the bottom up, and it starts with our ‘selves,'” he writes in “Firing Back.” “In early America, when people heard the word government, they would first think of how each of us, led by God’s Spirit, manages his or her own life. They called it ‘self-government.’ They understood that the character of a citizen was critical to the nature of the country. A nation peopled by wise, hardworking, loving citizens would be altogether different from a nation of dishonest, self-seeking rogues.” (p. 178)

But to be a self-governing people, there must be consensus on what is right and wrong, Akin suggests.

“Perhaps one of the greatest opportunities to return to good ideas and refute bad ideas is through the church,” he writes. “Churches exist in part to warn people of the bad consequences of bad ideas and teach obedience to God’s laws. The source of the Founders’ good ideas was the Bible. They saw the beautiful harmony between God’s Word and the natural world around them. Today, for all the good work our pastors do, many make the mistake of not applying the Bible to the critical issues of our day. This is probably one of the most urgently needed changes in America.” (p. 182)

Will critics find new reasons to guffaw in “Firing Back”?

For those who think it’s controversial to string together the two words “legitimate rape,” there’s no doubt plenty of ammunition for the Akin-haters in “Firing Back.”