Hillary an icon for women?

Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton is the darling of liberal/feminist groups. They have long proclaimed her the smartest woman in America among other plaudits. They would have us believe that she above all other women is worthy of our respect.

But in truth, Hillary is exactly the kind of woman right-minded parents would not want their daughters to emulate. She is a traitor to herself, and she is a traitor to feminist groups that spew women's rights rhetoric and who advocate that women not permit men to abuse them.

Hillary, however, has violated the trust radical liberals and feminists have placed in her, and she has done so on a global stage.

Hillary and her husband left Arkansas in 1992 heading for the bright lights of Washington, D.C., and the presidential sweepstakes.

The first national images of Hillary, the idol of radical feminists, we were treated to were of her attempting to explain away the salacious details that were revealed concerning her husband's 12-year adulterous affair with Gennifer Flowers.

TRENDING: Dutch government suggests masks could increase COVID risk due to incorrect wear

There was the fateful 1992 "60 Minutes" interview with Steve Kroft where when questioned about the affair she snapped: "I'm not sitting here like some little woman sitting by my man like Tammy Wynette. I'm sitting here because I love him and I respect him."

There was also the news program with Hillary saying: "I suppose I could have stayed home and baked cookies and had teas, but what I decided to do was to fulfill my profession, which I entered before my husband was in public life."

And "fulfill her profession" is exactly what Hillary has spent her life in the public eye doing, i.e., defending her husband against the legion of women who have been sexually abused, raped and/or assaulted by him. Hillary's career hasn't been one of public service – it has been one of public embarrassment and humiliation.

When she wasn't defending her husband from criminal charges of one sort or another, she was defending herself from same.

Hillary's political life has been a myriad of legal entanglements and behavior that at the very least border on treason and at the worst demands she be charged, found guilty and sentenced to prison for the maximum amount of time allowable under the law.

Hillary wants to be president, but she has proven herself incapable of restraint from alleged criminal behavior, going back to her time in Arkansas. She is a bitter harridan who has subverted justice and due process. I would also argue that she in concert with Obama suborned perjury in the aftermath of Benghazi.

Many believe Hillary has used her various positions to massively enhance her financial well-being on every quantifiable level.

What parent would want their daughter to be like Hillary? What kind of icon can she be for women? She has allowed herself to be publicly humiliated in the most degrading ways over and over. Is she basing her qualifications for the presidency on her ability to be humiliated or to not be forthcoming about the murders of Ambassador Stevens, Tyrone Woods, Sean Smith and Glen Doherty? Perhaps she is basing her qualifications to be president on her escaping the noose of Obama's illegal gunrunning operation called "Fast and Furious."

If the women and the causes of the groups she swore allegiance to cannot trust Hillary to comport herself in keeping with their ideologies, how can America trust her to honor the Constitution? If she, along with Obama, has abandoned any sense of honor to the oaths they swore, how can the American people trust her to keep one campaign promise?

While I do not believe that anyone could be a more contemptible and condemnable president than Obama, I think the distinction pursuant to same between she and him is negligible to the point of not being measurable.

Hillary should be forced to answer the questions surrounding the ocean of misdeeds, lies, cover-ups, betrayals, accusations of threats of physical harm to people who crossed her and/or her husband, and the simmering charges surrounding her husband's involvement with billionaire hedge fund manager Jeffrey Epstein and young girls barely in their teen years allegedly procured as sex slaves.

Hillary should be forced to explain why she has waged one of the most ruthless and public wars on women in history in her attempts to shield her husband from accusations of rape, assault, sexual abuse and strong allegations of poor, uneducated women who were convinced/forced to abort children he allegedly fathered.

Is this the type of woman these radical women's groups want to hold up as their standard bearer? Is this the kind of person we want back in the White House? Can America be certain that the evil machinations Hillary and her husband have been involved in worldwide won't be used to blackmail and extort favors and preferential treatment from our enemies?

Would we be able to sleep safely knowing Hillary was in charge?

Media wishing to interview Mychal Massie, please contact [email protected].