America: Look into minds of our adversaries

By Ben Kinchlow

Few things of significance “just happen.” Newton’s third law states: “For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.” Just as there are forces in nature that generate consequences, so in life.

One of the main reasons we find ourselves embroiled in the conflicts of Middle Eastern countries is due in large part to the failure of Western diplomats to comprehend the significant differences between Eastern and Western civilizations. This is evident in Egypt, Libya, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Syria, Turkey, et al, as the West rediscovers the animosity that exists between various Islamic sects and tribes. Whether pro or anti-Western, Eastern dictators have recognized this for years and simply subjugated the different groups under an iron heel. As undesirable as this approach may be to the Western mind, it prevents the chaos we are now witnessing across Europe.

Cultures arise as a result of the basic principles of a parent civilization. Just as the various cultures of India, China, Japan and the Middle East derived their behavior patterns from the basic philosophies of their parent, Eastern civilization, England, France, Germany, United States, et al., adhere to the basic philosophies of their parent, Western civilization. Just as the basic tenets of Western civilization are essentially a statement of Judeo-Christian biblical values, the moral precepts of Eastern civilizations are a statement of their religious values.

Something that was quite unfamiliar to most in the West was brought dramatically to our attention in World War II when the Japanese introduced us to “Hari Kari.” Japanese soldiers, who felt that the shame of defeat was “unbearable” or “dishonorable,” employed Hari Kari. Rather than lose face, they chose to retain/restore their honor by death at their own hand. There is no moral equivalency for this in the West. Losing face holds little terror for Westerners, as our viewpoint is predicated on the Judeo-Christian perspective of forgiveness, forbearance and mercy. These are all integral parts of our cultural and intellectual processes; they are not consciously practiced, they are just there, part of who we are.

In the East (absent the basic principles of the Judeo-Christian mindset), the concepts of forgiveness, forbearance, mercy, etc., are all foreign at best. These virtues are not an integral part of their cultural paradigm. The critical point becomes, therefore, not just the loss of land or a battle, but the loss of face and/or honor. Additionally, the give-and-take inherent in standard negotiations prevalent in the West has no equivalent in Middle Eastern cultures. Consider the recent Iran deal.

Concessions by an enemy are interpreted as appeasement or weakness. No conscientious member of any Middle Eastern or Far Eastern culture can allow himself, his tribe, his family, his religion or his country to lose face. Any such insult demands vengeance, usually accompanied by bloodshed, swift if possible, but implacable. A prime example of this philosophy is the “honor killing” of women by their own family members. Husbands have killed wives and fathers have killed daughters whom they feel have somehow “dishonored” them.

On a larger scale, some conflicts are known as “blood feuds.” Such feuds, as between the Turks and Kurds, the Chinese and Japanese, Hindus and Muslims, Sunnis and Shiites have existed for centuries. The lives and deaths of the participants are inextricably bound up with the customs and traditions that have resulted in these blood feuds. Since the concept of the blood feud, for all practical purposes, is unknown in the West, these issues, unrecognized, can constitute a grave danger to the West when it intervenes in Middle East conflicts.

The West has often simply partitioned territories, as with Europe, into East and West, anticipating that once these boundaries are established, peace will continue. Recall Newton’s theory: “For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.” Unfortunately for the West, externally imposed arbitrary geographical boundaries, to the Eastern mind, do not exist. Kurdish territory remains Kurdish territory.

Absent this insight, the West can become involved in a quagmire and be hated by both sides. Any attempt to placate one side will be seen as an act of hostility by the other. For example, to pacify the Shiite Muslims is to alienate the Sunni Muslims, and this exists throughout the entire Muslim world.

Wars are the result of sharp divisions between various groups having their own set of absolutes. Ignorance of the differences between these sets of absolutes has often left the West without the means of implementing lasting conflict resolutions, since in the Western mind our Judeo-Christian biblical values of liberty, equality, forgiveness, live-and-let-live are the basis for a set of absolutes that are applicable to all.

Without the knowledge of how your adversary thinks, and sees himself, there can be no lasting peace but merely the perpetuation of war.

Have you ever wondered what African-Americans want, and why they vote Democratic? Do you know how slavery actually began in America? Ben Kinchlow’s best-selling book “Black Yellowdogs” breaks race and politics down in black and white. Get your copy today!

Media wishing to interview Ben Kinchlow, please contact [email protected].

Leave a Comment