Trump can take black vote from Hillary

By Devvy Kidd

Those who are vigilant and follow the corrupt machine in Washington, D.C., are fully aware black Americans vote almost exclusively for Democrats. The majority have no knowledge or understanding of “cultural Marxism.”

They are conditioned by professional politicians like Bill and Hill to believe they are somehow defective and need Mother Government to take care of them from cradle to grave – keep them on the plantation for votes. Professional politicians like the Clintons campaign on promising massive unconstitutional spending to keep voters, like heroin addicts, coming back for more.

Donald Trump, on the other hand, is portrayed as a racist and the herds of Hillary followers believe it as gospel without doing a single minute of research.

But what does Hillary Clinton really think of black Americans?

In 2009, Hillary accepted the Margaret Sanger Award at the Planned Parenthood Honors Gala in Houston, Texas.

[jwplayer oVDdvqKY]

In her acceptance speech, Clinton said: “I admire Margaret Sanger enormously, her courage, her tenacity, her vision. I am really in awe of her, there are a lot of lessons we can learn from her life.”

Sanger’s vision was the work of Satan so much admired by Hillary Clinton:

“We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

(Margaret Sanger, Dec. 19, 1939, letter to Dr. Clarence Gamble. Original source: Sophia Smith Collection, Smith College, North Hampton, Massachusetts. Also described in Linda Gordon’s “Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America.”)

Sanger’s vision so greatly admired by Hillary:

“Birth control is not contraception indiscriminately and thoughtlessly practiced. It means the release and cultivation of the better racial elements in our society, and the gradual suppression, elimination and eventual extirpation of defective stocks – those human weeds which threaten the blooming of the finest flowers of American civilization.”

(“Margaret Sanger, Apostle of Birth Control Sees Cause Gaining Here,” New York Times, 1923-04-08, Page XII Ibid.)

Human weeds? Make no mistake about Sanger’s words – she is talking about black Americans.

Margaret Sanger, October 1926 issue of Birth Control Review:

[Slavs, Latin, and Hebrew immigrants are] human weeds … a deadweight of human waste … [Blacks, soldiers, and Jews are a] menace to the race. Eugenic sterilization is an urgent need … We must prevent Multiplication of this bad stock.”

“[Our objective is] unlimited sexual gratification without the burden of unwanted children .. [Women must have the right] to live … to love … to be lazy … to be an unmarried mother … to create … to destroy … The marriage bed is the most degenerative influence in the social order … The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.”

(Margaret Sanger, editor, “The Woman Rebel,” Vol. I, No. 1. Reprinted in “Woman and the New Race,” 1922)

That’s the woman Hillary Clinton admires so much.

Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, Dirty Harry Reid and so many others support the evil Margaret Sanger set into motion. Chapter 68 of “Margaret Sanger Mother of the Sexual Revolution”: “Margaret Sanger was born an innocent baby in 1879 and died a bisexual Demerol and alcohol addict who spawned the most monstrous organization ever conceived, the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF).”

No doubt if confronted with Sanger’s own words, Hillary (I prefer to call her Hildebeast) will have a ready-made response with something to the effect that she admired Sanger’s commitment to women’s health or some other such fat lie.

“Margaret Sanger aligned herself with the eugenicists whose ideology prevailed in the early 20th century. Eugenicists strongly espoused racial supremacy and ‘purity,’ particularly of the ‘Aryan’ race. Eugenicists hoped to purify the bloodlines and improve the race by encouraging the “fit” to reproduce and the ‘unfit’ to restrict their reproduction. They sought to contain the ‘inferior’ races through segregation, sterilization, birth control and abortion.

“Sanger embraced Malthusian eugenics. Thomas Robert Malthus, a 19th century cleric and professor of political economy, believed a population time bomb threatened the existence of the human race. He viewed social problems such as poverty, deprivation and hunger as evidence of this ‘population crisis.’ According to writer George Grant, Malthus condemned charities and other forms of benevolence, because he believed they only exacerbated the problems. His answer was to restrict population growth of certain groups of people. His theories of population growth and economic stability became the basis for national and international social policy. Grant quotes from Malthus’ magnum opus, An Essay on the Principle of Population, published in six editions from 1798 to 1826:

“‘All children born, beyond what would be required to keep up the population to a desired level, must necessarily perish, unless room is made for them by the deaths of grown persons. We should facilitate, instead of foolishly and vainly endeavoring to impede, the operations of nature in producing this mortality.’

“Malthus disciples believed if Western civilization were to survive, the physically unfit, the materially poor, the spiritually diseased, the racially inferior, and the mentally incompetent had to be suppressed and isolated – or even, perhaps, eliminated. His disciples felt the subtler and more ‘scientific’ approaches of education, contraception, sterilization and abortion were more ‘practical and acceptable ways’ to ease the pressures of the alleged overpopulation” (source: Tanya L. Green,

Hundreds of black pastors and ministers support Donald Trump. His campaign needs to put together a one-page flyer and send it off to those pastors and ministers with the truth about Margaret Sanger and Hillary Clinton’s very public support for her.

Trump should ask those members of the clergy to network all across this country to predominately black constituencies with that simple one-page flyer with two questions: Is that the person you want as president of our country? A woman who praises and is inspired by such an evil person as Margaret Sanger?

The same should also be done to Catholic churches all across this country. According to post-election research in 2008, 54 percent of CINOs (Catholics in Name Only) voted for Obama. Clinton wasn’t all that far behind. As supporters of sexual deviants and the myth called “same-sex marriage” and Planned Parenthood started up by a promoter of eugenics targeting black Americans, no real Catholic could possibly vote for Obama and Clinton – yet they did in 2008. Perhaps if those voters find out who the real Hillary is, they might change their vote this November.

It’s too bad members of the clergy in this country can’t hand the same flyer out to their flocks on Sunday, but that would run afoul of the Gestapo (IRS). However, outside the church there’s no law that says congregants can’t stand and hand out the flyer. Thanks to social media, Hillary Clinton’s support of such an evil woman as Margaret Sanger and her agenda would travel like wildfire. If Donald Trump wants to bring black Americans as well as Catholics to the voting booth in his favor, go after Mrs. Clinton using her own words.

Devvy Kidd’s new book, “Taking Politics Out of Solutions: What Congress and the Media Won’t Tell You,” is now available.

Leave a Comment