Racists claim it's harder to post hate on WND than CNN

WASHINGTON – White racists, neo-Nazis and anti-Semites bemoan the fact that they can't post their hate on WND's commenting boards but have no problem getting their messages out on CNN, Bloomberg, Businessweek and other so-called "mainstream media" websites, they say in protests of WND's moderation team.

Here is an excerpt of one note of protest posted on an overtly racist, white supremacist, neo-Nazi and viciously anti-Semitic website called Stormfront:

Exalt
Forum Member

Default My Censorship Report for Disqus-Based Sites
My censorship report for fall 2013 and winter 2014.
These are sites that use the Disqus commenting system.

TRENDING: 'Staggering': Cutting food-stamp fraud, waste could save BILLIONS

www. cnn .com - Many pro-white comments...and then...poof! All comments suddenly disappear.
www. wnd .com - Either censored or may require email verify.
www. bloomberg .com - Posted successfully.
www. businessweek .com - Posted successfully.
frontpagemag .com - Posted successfully.
www. thetelegraph .com - Posted successfully.

These results are all based on my own posting experiences.

Joseph Farah, the Christian founder of WND, which is the largest Christian website in the world of any kind – media, ministry, demonization, TV network, etc. – had this to say about the barrage of hate and vitriol his company has had to endure from the haters: "'The Big Media' doth protest too much about the alternative media's role in spreading hate. In fact, you will see the white racists and the neo-Nazis on their own TV programs. They seek them out for interviews. Yet, sites like WND make sure their racist comments always wind up on the cutting-room floor. The haters have no trouble penetrating the likes of Bloomberg, Businessweek or the Telegraph. They are welcome guests there and at other so-called 'mainstream news' sites. That's the truth, that's the reality of what really goes on behind the scenes."

Like the reporting you see here? Sign up for free news alerts from WND.com, America's independent news network.

Other Stormfront comments noted how WND has no tolerance for "white power" postings and those promoting anti-Semitic ideas are always blocked.

"All the while, the establishment media – from CNN to the New York Times – continually attempt to smear the alternative media," says Farah. "Clearly the shoe is on the other foot. As I've noted in my columns in the past, just look at who eagerly provides the platform for these haters."

To make the case against Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, the New York Times enlisted the following sources:

• Matthew Heimbach, founder of the Traditionalist Worker Party, an American group that aims to preserve the privileged place of whiteness in Western civilization, who calls Putin his ideal ruler, according to the Times. Did Heimbach even support Trump? The Times doesn't say. What does that tell you?

• Sam Dickson, a white supremacist and former Ku Klux Klan lawyer who frequently speaks at gatherings of the so-called alt-right, a far-right fringe movement that embraces white nationalism and a range of racist and anti-immigrant positions, as the Times describes him.

• Jared Taylor, the founder of American Renaissance, a white supremacist think tank, as the Times characterizes it.

• Richard B. Spencer, who runs the website AlternativeRight.com and directs the National Policy Institute, an alt-right group based in Montana, and who, according to the Times, has hailed Putin as a protector of the white race. He was quoted by the Nation magazine as saying: "I think we should be pro-Russia because Russia is the great white power that exists in the world."