The rogue regime in North Korea has sent America a threat, through the unusual channel of a letter to Australia, promising it will respond to “fire with fire.”

North Korea has been issuing threats against America for some time, both through its statements and its actions.

Friday, the London Mirror reported that Kim Jong Un’s rhetoric had been boosted another notch, with his declaration the U.S. will have to put up with his nuclear status.

“This is a matter of life and death for us,” the RIA news agency reported him as saying. “The current situation deepens our understanding that we need nuclear weapons to repel a potential attack.

“We will respond to fire with fire.”

The alarming comment, the Mirror said, came from North Korea’s foreign ministry.

“Choe Son-hui, director-general of the North American department of North Korea’s foreign ministry, said possession of nuclear weapons was ‘a matter of life and death’ for the regime as they are needed to respond to potential attack,” the report said.

And he said his country views any efforts to “strangle” North Korea with sanctions imposed by the United Nations as a declaration of war.

Pyongyang warned in letter to Australia’s parliament that Australia’s ally, Donald Trump, will “totally destroy the whole world.”

“If Trump thinks that he would bring the DPRK, a nuclear power, to its knees through nuclear war threat, it will be a big miscalculation and an expression of ignorance,” said the letter, published by the Sydney Morning Herald.

A series of missile tests by North Korea and boasts of nuclear weaponry have raised tensions around the globe.

WND reported several days ago when North Korea said it might be willing to engage in diplomacy with the United States over its missile program – but only after it has an ICBM capable of reaching “all the way to the East Coast of the mainland U.S.”

The statement followed shortly after word that a congressional subcommittee on homeland security heard from two experts who have been studying America’s vulnerability to an existential threat – a real-life “doomsday scenario.”

That’s the threat of a North Korean nuclear attack on the U.S. that would be unimaginably worse than turning a city like Chicago or Denver into ashes, they testified. If just one of the nuclear weapons North Korea is now known to possess could be directed toward the heartland of the U.S. and detonated in the upper atmosphere, it could fry the electrical grid with an electromagnetic pulse (EMP), paralyze communications and transportation nationwide, instantly plunge the country back into a 19th century-style existence and cause 90 percent of Americans to starve to death in one year.

The apocalyptic scenario of a nuclear blast and the cascading failure of America’s grid systems was delivered recently by William Graham, chairman of the Commission to Assess the Threat to the U.S. from an EMP Attack, and Peter Pry, chief of staff to the commission, to the Homeland Security Subcommittee on Oversight and Management Efficiency.

In fact, Graham and Pry suggested permitting the U.S. to become so vulnerable to such an attack from a rogue nation could be one of the gravest oversights in the history of American security.

It’s a warning Graham has been delivering to Congress for a decade, as first reported by WND in 2008.

The difference today, however, is that North Korea is developing the capacity to carry out the relatively simple, low-tech attack.

“With the development of small nuclear arsenals and long-range missiles by new, radical U.S. adversaries, beginning with North Korea the threat of a nuclear EMP attack against the U.S. becomes one of the few ways that such a country could inflict devastating damage to the United States,” they wrote in a prepared joint statement.

Related column: ‘How North Korea could destroy America’ by Joseph Farah

There’s little doubt North Korea is preparing for just such an attack.

Last month, North Korea detonated a hydrogen bomb that is described as a capable of a “super-powerful EMP” attack and released a technical report called “The EMP Might of Nuclear Weapons.”

Ironically, that was the same month the Department of Defense terminated funding of the EMP Commission, which has spent 17 years attempting to alert Congress and the White House to this catastrophic vulnerability – one, the commission says, is not expensive to remediate.


In 2013, WND Books published “A Nation Forsaken,” which detailed the EMP threat to the U.S., as well as the way the U.S. government was ignoring it. Now this prophetic book is more timely than ever.

“And today, as the EMP Commission has long warned, the nation faces a potentially imminent and existential threat of nuclear EMP attack from North Korea,” the report by Graham and Pry said. “Recent events have proven the EMP Commission’s critics wrong about other highly important aspects of the nuclear threat from North Korea.”

The report points out that six months ago, most experts believed North Korea’s nuclear arsenal was primitive and limited to as few as six H-Bombs. Now the intelligence community estimates the number at 60. And with an EMP attack, it only takes one success.

In fact, six months ago, many of the experts believed North Korea’s ICBMs were fake, or, if real, incapable of striking the U.S. mainland. Now the intelligence community acknowledges that North Korea’s missiles can strike Denver, Chicago and perhaps the entire U.S.

High-altitude EMP blast

High-altitude EMP blast

Also, six months ago, most experts thought North Korea was many years away from developing an H-bomb. Now, the commission says, it appears North Korea has H-bombs comparable to sophisticated U.S. two-stage thermonuclear weapons.

What do you do when the lights go out? Learn the best way to keep “Lights On”

North Koreas has tested an H-bomb that could produce a devastating EMP attack – even issuing a public statement about it a year ago: “The H-bomb, the explosive power of which is adjustable from tens of kilotons to hundreds of kilotons, is a multi-functional thermonuclear weapon with great destructive power which can be detonated even at high altitudes for super-powerful EMP attack, according to strategic goals.”

Graham and Pry suggest the impact of just one nuclear weapon used to produce a strategic EMP-style attack makes it far more likely that North Korea, or even terrorists, would prefer to use it in a mid-air detonation than to simply destroy one American city.

In 2004, two Russian generals, both EMP experts, warned the U.S. EMP Commission that the design for Russia’s super-EMP warhead was “accidentally” transferred to North Korea. They also said Russian scientists were in North Korea, as were Chinese and Pakistani scientists, helping them with its nuclear weapons programs.

In the kind of EMP attack the commission fears, no one is killed. It’s possible most Americans would not even be aware that it happened, unless they were following the news. The impact is felt in the electrical grid when circuits are fried. Power could be down indefinitely – certainly up to a year. With America’s transportation and communications systems down, food shortages would be seen within days. Within weeks, people in cities would begin to starve.

North Korea’s missile test on April 29 detonated at an altitude of 72 kilometers, the optimum altitude for an EMP test. Had it been carrying a nuclear weapon, it would have wiped out all digital communications and power over a 930-kilometer radius.

What’s the best defense against a catastrophic EMP attack for the average American? Long-term, emergency food. The blast won’t hurt you, but the aftermath of chaos and disruption of food supplies will.

The commission’s recommendations include:

  • The creation by President Trump of a new Cabinet secretary to oversee the management of a U.S. national infrastructure protection and defense system against such existential threats.
  • The establishment of a joint presidential-congressional commission.
  • The issuance by President Trump of a new executive order to counter the threat.
  • The protection of U.S. military forces and critical national infrastructure as outlined by the commissions reports in 2004 and 2008.
  • The issuance of a declaration by President Trump stating that EMP or other attacks that threaten to black out the national grid constitute pre-emptive and retaliatory responses by the U.S. using all possible means, including nuclear weapons.
  • A call on the president to the secretary of defense to use technical means to determine if there is a nuclear weapon aboard North Korea’s satellites that orbit the U.S. If it found that one of them does, it should be destroyed when over a broad ocean area where it will do the least damage.
  • A recommendation to the president to direct the secretary of homeland security to harden the FirstNet emergency communications system against EMP.
  • A recommendation to the president to harden the more than 100 nuclear power reactors and their spent fuel storage facilities against an EMP attack, as well as the national grid.

See the complete report.

As WND reported in 2008, an EMP attack is devastating because of the unprecedented cascading failures of major infrastructures that could result. Because of America’s heavy reliance on electricity and electronics, the impact would be far worse than in a country less advanced technologically. Graham and the commission reported almost 10 years ago that the potential for failure in the financial system, the system of distribution for food and water, medical care and trade and production.

“The recovery of any one of the key national infrastructures is dependent upon the recovery of others,” Graham said. “The longer the outage, the more problematic and uncertain the recovery will be. It is possible for the functional outages to become mutually reinforcing until at some point the degradation of infrastructure could have irreversible effects on the country’s ability to support its population.”

The earlier report also said that preparation could avoid a disaster.

Graham and Pry also warned of the catastrophic impact of an EMP attack in 2012, but that was before North Korea was known to be preparing for just such a scenario.

In 2013, WND Books published “A Nation Forsaken,” which detailed the EMP threat to the U.S., as well as the way the U.S. government was ignoring it. Now this prophetic book is more timely than ever.

What’s the best defense against a catastrophic EMP attack for the average American? Long-term, emergency food. The blast won’t hurt you, but the aftermath of chaos and disruption of food supplies will.


Note: Read our discussion guidelines before commenting.