Before I get to another compelling reason for you not to send your children to public schools, let me first make two observations: 1) without a constant source of replacement homosexuals, homosexual numbers would dwindle to near nonexistence; and 2) “public schools” do not own your children. Now, onto what I have to say about the taxpayer-funded bureaus of agitprop and indecency called public schools.
California long ago surpassed the debauchery of Sodom and Gomorrah, but now the state purposes to set the bar of debauchery so low that even a person paralyzed from the ears down would be able to leap over it.
California has become the first state in history to mandate that elementary schools use the most abnormal, debaucherous and sexually deviant homosexual textbooks. And they have done it by fiat. Not only is it now “the law” that the public schools must use textbooks that incorporate sexual perversion in elementary schools, but they have given parents no choices for opting out. (See: “California Parents Barred From Opting Kids Out of Mandatory LGBT-Inclusive Textbooks,” truthrevolt.org, Dec. 26, 2017.)
First of all, parents do have an “opt-out.” It is called “private Christian schools and/or homeschooling,” and parents who are concerned about the health of their children’s education should avail themselves of one or both.
I contend, and nothing dissuades me, that the real reasons sexual deviants are forcing their deviance upon children in kindergarten through fifth grade is because the sexual deviancy they practice is not normal and neither is it genetic. Ergo, they must continually find ways to replenish their kind. If they do not desensitize young children to the abnormality and ungodliness of this perversion by the time untainted children are adults, they will reject personal participation in this practice.
The publisher of the textbooks to be used in the eighth grade said: “We’re not trying to make anybody [homosexual]; we’re not saying there’s an agenda; we’re not saying that these people are better than other people; what we’re saying is this is another group of Americans and they face certain prejudices.”
That’s an unmitigated lie. Everything he claims they aren’t doing, by their own written agenda they in fact intend to see happen. It is part of the homosexual agenda’s goal. The following is an excerpt from part one of the “homosexual manifesto” (first published in Gay Community News, Feb. 15-21, 1987, and also placed into the Congressional Record. Author: Michael Swift):
- “Our writers and artists will make love between men fashionable and de rigueur, and we will succeed because we are adept at setting styles.”
- “We will sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms … youth groups. … Your sons … will be recast in our image.”
In the Spring 2003 Issue of City Journal, Marjorie King wrote what remains possibly as the most thorough treatise on this subject titled: “Queering the Schools – [homosexual] activist groups, with teachers’ unions applause, are importing a disturbing agenda into the nation’s public schools.”
In an effort to legitimize the illegitimate, the California book publisher of aberrant sexuality stated: “The history textbooks include special mention of the sexual preferences of historical figures like Jane Adams, Emily Dickinson, Nathaniel Hawthorne, [and] President James Buchanan.” Yet the textbook author admits that “It’s inconclusive if these prominent Americans were [homosexual] or not.”
The author explains his reasoning for asserting President Buchanan was a homosexual as: “Buchanan … never married. He had a very good friend who was living with him. He may have been [homosexual]. On the other hand, at that time, being [homosexual] was seen as something evil and wrong.” Following this publisher’s rationale, if a person lived with a dog and never married, he would be into bestiality.
When this sewage of invented history is examined, what one sees is an amalgam of lies intended to sway public opinion, decrease criticism and present the illusion of normalcy to that which is not.
Parents do have control of the education their children receive; the question is why are so many unwilling to exercise it? Churches and true Christians who have been blessed with economic success should and must help finance Christian schools at the churches they attend and provide a sliding scale tuition, making it possible for even the poorest of our communities to attend wholesome, factual and Christ-centered academic institutions. We must educate parents on how vouchers work so they are able to take advantage of same.
Children are the assets of tomorrow, and sending children to public schools and liberal universities and colleges that teach homosexuality will not produce future adults we want to secure our future upon.