Green New Deal socialists are sinking Dems

By Andy Schlafly

The far left is taking over the Democratic Party, creating a potential repeat of their landslide defeat in the 1972 presidential election when a vulnerable Richard Nixon trounced the liberal George McGovern. The radical “Green New Deal” illustrates how the so-called progressives, which is a euphemism for socialists, are driving the agenda for Democrats today.

This fanciful scheme tries to convert nearly all of our energy to wind, water and solar power within a decade. Currently, only about 10 percent of our energy needs are met by the inefficient wind and solar resources.

President Trump is already mocking this fanciful plan. Speaking to a massive crowd of supporters in El Paso, Texas, Trump declared, “I really don’t like their policy of taking away your car, of taking away your airplane rights, of ‘let’s hop a train to California,’ of you’re not allowed to own cows anymore!”

With characteristic wit, Trump added that “it would shut down a little thing called air travel. How do you take a train to Europe?”

He could have added that the Green New Deal will take away many American jobs, too, by hindering economic growth. Wind and solar power are more expensive than energy based on traditional fossil fuels, such as coal and oil, and higher costs limit economic growth.

Full-scale socialism, with strict government control of the production and use of energy, would be necessary to implement the Green New Deal. So it is not surprising that a self-described democratic-socialist, freshman Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., is its chief sponsor.

She is making so many waves in Congress that she is known by her initials, “AOC.” Defeated Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., expressed dismay at the attention given to AOC, but she appears to be the future of the Democratic Party.

An entrenched Democrat was routed by AOC in his own primary, and many Democrats are fearful of the same fate if they oppose the new “progressive” agenda championed by AOC and other socialists. Sen. Bernie Sanders, himself a socialist who supports the Green New Deal, nearly won the nomination for president in 2016 and could be the flag-bearer for the party in 2020.

Already, more established Democrats are supporting this plan, including longtime former Rep. and now-Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass. Presidential candidates in the Democratic Party are also lining up in support of it, including prominent Sens. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., and Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass.

Meanwhile, Hawaii overwhelmingly supports the Democratic Party, but residents there are fighting a proposed wind farm to be built on West Oahu.

As small islands in the middle of the wind currents of the Pacific Ocean, scenic Hawaii has perhaps more to offer to wind energy than any other American location. Installation of additional clunky eyesores of windmills atop Hawaii would be a green energy dream come true.

But Hawaiian residents do not want them, and neither do many environmentalists. Wind farms blight the beautiful landscape, create a constant irritating noise and injure wildlife.

Yet this is what the “democratic-socialists” want to impose on the entire United States, in their fantasy that this might reduce much-ballyhooed climate change. It is difficult to see how some windmills atop Hawaii would reduce hurricanes in Florida, but that is what supporters of the Green New Deal effectively claim.

President Trump has seized upon the absurdity of his opponents, the presidential wannabes. No politician can mock the other side as effectively as Trump does, and the Green New Deal gives him much material to work with.

Even House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., disparaged the Green New Deal as the “Green dream, or whatever they call it.” Perennial potential presidential candidate and billionaire Michael Bloomberg buys into the climate change theory of the left, but cautioned against “things that are pie in the sky.”

Yet it seems doubtful that the old guard will be able to rein in the rising socialists who are not content with incremental changes. Sen. Dianne Feinstein struggled to win re-election against a challenge by an underfunded leftist in California, and surely many other Democrats have taken notice of the political winds that are blowing strongly toward socialism in their party.

All this is good news for President Trump’s re-election campaign, just as it was for President Nixon in 1972. The Democrats got branded then as the party of “acid, amnesty and abortion.”

Then, as now, it was an established Democrat who voiced criticism of his own party. McGovern’s own initial choice for his running mate, Sen. Tom Eagleton, expressed that criticism in an off-the-record interview with conservative columnist Bob Novak, who then published it without disclosing its source until after Eagleton’s death.

History repeats itself as Democrats implode on the eve of a presidential election year.

Leave a Comment