Elizabeth 'Woodrow' Warren: The scariest candidate

Of the top tier of candidates vying for the Democratic nomination for president, one may be scarier than the others, and it may not be who you think.

A month or so ago, I wrote that Kamala Harris was rapidly gaining ground, and I thought that she, as a black women, might pose the most problems for Trump.

This may still be true, but it's not the purpose of this article.

Rather than just speculating on just who might win, I wanted to take a look at who may be the worst, most dangerous choice as president from the left – not who can likely beat Trump, just who would be the most damaging, should he or she win.

So just who is the worst of the worst?

TRENDING: Citing state of affairs in U.S., Schiff jokes 'we may all' move to Canada

Front-runner Joe Biden is a walking gaffe-machine and as crooked as a dog's hind leg. But he may very well be losing his faculties, so if he wins, someone else will be running things from behind the curtain.

Bernie Sanders was the fresh-faced curmudgeon in 2016. But now he is just a curmudgeon – and an angry one at that. His abrasiveness is getting old, as is he, and won't be compatible to governance. He has no shot anyway.

It's Elizabeth Warren, aka Fauxahontas, aka Elizabeth Wilson, aka, Woodrow Warren, who should scare us all. More and more, she appears to be the second coming of Woodrow Wilson – the worst, most transformably dangerous president in our history.

There are many similarities between Wilson and Warren, but the most foreboding has to be their shared background as leftist academics.

As Glenn Beck noted, they both studied law, but more importantly, they both ended up teaching at Ivy League universities. Wilson was at Princeton and Warren, Harvard. Princeton was/is bad enough then and now, but there is no more left Ivy League school than Harvard. They provide the most dangerous combination. Not only does Harvard produce many more than their fare share of leftists, but it is the go-to government farm team. If you wish to work in Washington, you first attend Harvard.

Ever wonder why we have so many radicals working in the Deep State? That's why.

Warren's new slogan, which seems to have vaulted her past the crowded field and into third place is, "I've Got a Plan for That."

And indeed she does. Just like the university professor who is hired on for name recognition only, but rarely does any actual teaching, nor develops his or her lesson plan, most of Warren's "Plans" aren't hers at all. They've been written by fellow pointy-headed academics. And these academics aren't constitutionalist Hillsdale College professors. Oh no. These are radical professors from the most left-leaning departments and colleges in the nation. Departments like the Georgetown University Law Center on Poverty and Inequality, and universities like Berkeley. They don't get any more radical than that. And that's just because there is no University of Antifa. Not yet anyway.

And neither Wilson nor Warren would have the slightest problem with this.

In the eyes of Warren and her predecessor, Wilson, this is as it should be. After all, academics are life's experts. Despite a complete lack of real-world experience, these trained academics, with their master's degrees in government studies and Ph.D.s in the pseudosciences, know best how to order the lives of the ordinary citizen. Whatever the problem, whatever the issue, they have a plan for that.

Wilson single-handedly attempted to take a wrecking ball to the Constitution. He is the father of the leftist progressive movement and the patriarch of the fourth branch of government – the administrative/regulatory state. And Warren, like Wilson, has designs to be the Philip Dru, Administrator, of the 21st century.