
The first family's official Christmas ornament is seen decorating the tree in the Bookseller's Room of the White House Sunday, Dec. 1, 2019. (Official White House photo by Andrea Hanks)
It's that time of year when "grinches" all over the country object to the inclusion of religious elements in Christmas decorations.
Advertisement - story continues below
In happens in housing subdivisions, housing complexes, courthouses and even whole towns.
And now Becket, a public-interest law firm focusing on the free expression of religions, has awarded the city of Dunwoody, Georgia, its Ebenezer Award.
TRENDING: Don't let the 'old man' in!
It goes each year to the "biggest Scrooge," who exhibits the "most absurd" affront to "the Christmas and Hanukkah season."
Advertisement - story continues below
The Dunwoody City Council voted unanimously to bar religious symbols and displays in common areas of city-owned buildings. It called the move a "sterilization of religious symbols that would make the Grinch grin with pride."
The award recognizes this year's "biggest bah, humbug."
Becket said: "The curmudgeonly city council originally proposed a list of acceptable and unacceptable symbols. But after (rightly) coming under fire for prohibiting the menorah, the city council scrapped the list for a more blanketly discriminatory ban. The city council cited a 1989 Supreme Court case, County of Allegheny v. ACLU, as the basis for their policy, demonstrating a flawed understanding of Supreme Court jurisprudence concerning religious displays. 'Decorating with religious symbols is not appropriate in common areas of the city building unless the decorations are part of a display celebrating religious diversity or religious freedom,' the policy reads."
"The United States Constitution doesn’t prohibit religious symbols and displays in the public square," said Montse Alvarado, executive director of Becket, "The Supreme Court has long protected religious holiday displays from the affronts of rabid secularists."
Becket said it does Santa’s "dirty work for him, delivering a lump of coal as an acknowledgment of scroogery on a grand scale."
Advertisement - story continues below
Prior "winners" included:
- The Department of Veteran Affairs banned workers in its Salem, Virginia, office from saying "Merry Christmas" to veterans
- The University of Minnesota banned from campus anything "red, green, blue, and silver, Santas, bows, dreidels and even wrapped presents."
- The city of Sioux Falls, South Dakota, ruled temporarily that school children who painted city snowplow blades with holiday themes had to paint over them because they included religious images. The city quickly abandoned that plan.
Last year the "honor" went to Durham, New Hampshire, for banning a menorah from the town's holiday display.
City officials found it was not "inclusive" enough.
Advertisement - story continues below
"Year after year, bureaucrats come together to micromanage the holiday season, unwilling to let people of goodwill and diverse beliefs live side by side in peace without the strong arm of local government instructing them in how best to get along," said Alvarado. "Nothing says 're-elect me' like a prohibition on Christmas Spirit, but that’s a lesson secularists seem to want to learn the hard way."
The legal advocate's message to all?
"Becket wishes everyone a Merry Christmas, a Happy Hanukkah, and a Joyous New Year to all!"