DOJ: Foreigners may have tried to penetrate Christopher Steele-linked company

By Around the Web

President Donald J. Trump participates in a governors’ video teleconference on partnership to prepare, mitigate and respond to COVID-19 Thursday, March 26, 2020, in the White House Situation Room. (Official White House photo by Shealah Craighead)

[Editor’s note: This story originally was published by the Daily Caller News Foundation.]

By Chuck Ross
Daily Caller News Foundation

The Justice Department told Congress that the FBI team that investigated the Trump campaign received information that a foreign government might have tried to penetrate a research company linked to dossier author Christopher Steele.

The information is contained in a classified footnote in the Justice Department inspector general’s report of the FBI’s surveillance of the Trump campaign.

The footnote presents “unique and significant concerns” for the Justice Department, Stephen E. Boyd, the assistant attorney general for legislative affairs, told Sens. Chuck Grassley and Ron Johnson.

Boyd did not identify the research company or individuals linked to Steele. The former MI6 officer operates the London-based Orbis Business Intelligence. The Washington, D.C.-based opposition research firm Fusion GPS hired him in 2016 on behalf of Democrats to investigate Donald Trump.

Neither Orbis nor Fusion GPS responded to emails asking whether they were the target of a foreign government operation.

Boyd’s letter does not provide enough information to know whether the foreign operative successfully penetrated the company linked to Steele. The letter also does not say whether the foreign operation led to false information winding up in the dossier.

The footnote in question is one of four that Grassley and Johnson had pressured the DOJ to declassify from an inspector general’s report on the FBI’s surveillance of the Trump campaign.

One of the footnotes that was declassified said the FBI received evidence that Russian operatives fed disinformation to Steele that wound up in the dossier.

Daniel Hoffman, a retired CIA clandestine operations officer, theorized over two years ago that Russia’s intelligence services likely had an eye on Steele, and might have infiltrated his source network. Hoffman noted in a Jan. 28, 2018, op-ed in The Wall Street Journal that Russians could have gained insight into Steele’s activities through their hacks of the Democratic National Committee, which had indirectly hired Steele to investigate Trump.

Steele, a former MI6 officer, collected information from a single source, who in turn gathered tidbits of information from sub-sources. The source, who has not been identified, disputed many of the allegations that Steele attributed to him in the dossier during interviews in 2017 with the FBI.

The still-classified footnote — number 342 — appears on page 189 of the IG report. It denotes a section of the report discussing why there were discrepancies between Steele and his primary dossier source.

Peter Strzok, who served as deputy chief of FBI counterintelligence, told his boss, Bill Priestap, that Steele “may not be in a position to judge the reliability of his sub-source network,” the report stated.

An FBI supervisory intel analyst said the discrepancies between Steele and his sources could be attributed to several different factors, including possible “miscommunications” between Steele and his primary source, or “misrepresentations” from either Steele or the source, according to the report.

Grassley and Johnson said Friday that they will continue pushing the Justice Department to declassify and release the fourth footnote as well as information still redacted in the other three footnotes.

[Editor’s note: This story originally was published by the Daily Caller News Foundation.]

Leave a Comment