Is the Jan. 6 committee even legitimate? U.S. appeals court has doubts

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi at her weekly news conference March 17, 2022. (Video screenshot)

WND is now on Trump's Truth Social! Follow us @WNDNews

Just as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's partisan committee that she ordered to "investigate" the January 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol announced its next staged "hearing" will be held Sept. 28, a court opinion has cited doubts about its legitimacy.

It came in an unusual ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

It affirmed the dismissal of a fight by the Republican National Committee against a subpoena from Pelosi's committee, which is partisan because she refused to seat GOP members nominated by their own party and instead hand-picked two Republicans whose opposition to President Donald Trump is well-established.

TRENDING: The Medicare time bomb

The committee largely has accepted only testimony that could damage Trump, and it has refused to delve into the evidence that officials responsible for the Capitol's security, include Pelosi, refused President Trump's offer of National Guard troops for that day.

The case was dismissed because the committee withdrew its subpoena for detailed RNC information, making the case moot.

Typically in such cases a court essentially releases a short order that the case is dead.

In this case, however, the court went much further, citing significant constitutional questions now left unresolved because of the committee's decision to run away from the fight.

"The subpoena sought various documents held by Salesforce.com, an RNC vendor, regarding fundraising emails sent by the RNC to its supporters," the judges wrote. "The RNC claimed that disclosure of these documents would reveal sensitive information about its digital strategy, so it sued to prevent the disclosure.

"The RNC argued that the committee was not lawfully constituted and that the subpoena violated the First Amendment."

While the case was on appeal, Pelosi's committee suddenly "reversed course."

"It withdrew the subpoena, promised not to renew it, and moved to dismiss the appeal as moot. … Because the committee caused the mootness and thereby deprived us of the ability to review the district court's decision, and given the important and unsettled constitutional questions that the appeal would have presented, we vacate the district court's judgment."

The court cited a previous case that included a decision to vacate a lower court's judgement over a party's "avoidance of constitutional questions."

Just the News which posted the court's order online, said the judges "went out of way to acknowledge RNC’s appeal raised important issues and also took a dig at Democrats for vacillating."

The report said, "The appellate judges went out of their way to acknowledge the RNC's concerns about the subpoena raising important issues and that the lower court's ruling needed to be reversed."

WND previously reported that the fight over the legitimacy of Pelosi's partisan group already has been submitted to various courts.

In fact, at least three individuals, Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, broadcaster Alex Jones, and U.S. Rep. Scott Perry, R-Pa., all have challenged the committee's authority in separate legal actions.

They joined a long list of others who already have sued, charging the committee is trying to abrogate the Constitution's First Amendment with its demands, and isn't even legitimate because it fails to meet the requirements of the authorizing resolution.

The committee, for which Pelosi recruited anti-Trump GOP members, Liz Cheney of Wyoming and Rep. Kinzinger of Illinois, has issued broad demands for statements, evidence, phone records, testimony and much, much more.

But the Gateway Pundit documented that Flynn sought in court a restraining order against Pelosi and her committee.

That request explained, "General Flynn did not organize, speak at, or actively participate in any rallies or protests in Washington, D.C., on January 6, 2021, and he of course did not participate in the attack on the Capitol that day. Ex. A, Declaration of Michael Flynn ('Flynn Decl.') ¶ 5. Nevertheless, the Select Committee—assuming the role of shadow prosecutor for the January 6 attack and working in parallel with the actual prosecutors at the Department of Justice—has diverted its attention from its important work to target General Flynn for a quasi-prosecution that is either aimless or transparently partisan."

He continued, "Despite not participating in any public events in Washington on January 6, Defendants have issued General Flynn a sweeping subpoena seeking twenty different categories of documents and a demand that General Flynn appear for a deposition in Washington, D.C. The subpoena demands records of General Flynn’s communications about the 2020 election, and seeks to identify the basis for his beliefs and the persons with whom he associated, in addition to contacts with government officials. It thus constitutes a frontal assault on his 1st Amendment rights to freedom of speech, association, and petition."

The Washington Examiner reported Perry was declining to appear before the commission, insisting Pelosi's faction wasn't legitimate.

"I stand with immense respect for our Constitution, the Rule of Law, and the Americans I represent who know that this entity is illegitimate, and not duly constituted under the rules of the US House of Representatives," he stated. "I decline this entity’s request and will continue to fight the failures of the radical Left who desperately seek distraction from their abject failures of crushing inflation, a humiliating surrender in Afghanistan, and the horrendous crisis they created at our border."

(1/2) I stand with immense respect for our Constitution, the Rule of Law, and the Americans I represent who know that this entity is illegitimate, and not duly constituted under the rules of the US House of Representatives.

— RepScottPerry (@RepScottPerry) December 21, 2021

(2//2) I decline this entity’s request and will continue to fight the failures of the radical Left who desperately seek distraction from their abject failures of crushing inflation, a humiliating surrender in Afghanistan, and the horrendous crisis they created at our border.

— RepScottPerry (@RepScottPerry) December 21, 2021

The committee chairman, Rep. Bennie Thompson, had accused Perry of having "multiple text and other communications with President Trump's former Chief of Staff regarding" Jeffrey Clark, as well as various "communications with the White House," in demanding his testimony.

It was Politico that reported broadcaster Alex Jones had sued the committee to block members of obtaining his telephone records and compelling him to testify.

Politico pointed out the committee already was facing "a flood" of litigation, including cases from John Eastman, a lawyer who has sued to protect his phone records. Also, Cleta Mitchell, a prominent conservative attorney who joined Trump's early January call with Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, sued to quash a subpoena from the committee.

WND also had reported on a case against the committee from Ali Alexander, the national organizer of "Stop the Steal."

His charges include that the committee is illegitimate, because it never has complied with the resolution that created it, and its subpoenas are therefore irrelevant.

The case was filed by lawyers Jonathan Moseley and Paul Kamenar, who is serving as Alexander's main attorney.

Moseley explained he was attorney of record, and that "Stop the Steal, LLC" was to encourage all responsible to address the concerns of millions of voters about how their votes were counted.

"'Stop the Steal' held many rallies and events in cities around the country over many months, without incident which were 100% peaceful. Stop the Steal never had any relationship whatsoever to any act of violence nor any goal of preventing the certification of the Electoral College vote," the statement from Moseley explained.

"The nation’s political class is gripped with a Salem Witch Trial like madness which is unable or unwilling to distinguish between approximately 50-250 people who were violent, and the exercise of free speech by hundreds of thousands of peaceful demonstrators," the statement said. "Hyper-ventilating articles confuse Ali Alexander as helping to organize the 100% peaceful and lawful demonstration at the Ellipse and Washington Monument because it 'preceded' some violence at the Capitol."

IMPORTANT NOTE: How is it possible that the greatest and freest nation in world history has so rapidly come under the control of serially lying, deranged, power-mad sociopaths – leaders with nothing but contempt for America, for its history, its Constitution, its Judeo-Christian culture and its people? Orwell’s “1984” points directly to the answer: The elites are changing America’s language itself, so that people’s words – and therefore, their very thoughts – inevitably come under the control of the ruling class. It’s a way of bending reality in real time, so that what is illusion appears to be true, while what is real and true appears to be lies, misinformation, “hate speech,” “conspiracy theories” and “extremism.” This extraordinarily powerful but little-understood weapon of war employed 24/7 by the Marxist left is completely explained, exposed and exploded in the August issue of WND’s acclaimed monthly Whistleblower magazine, “NEWSPEAK 2022: How tyrants and lunatics are enslaving Americans by redefining everything.”

For 25 years, WND has boldly brought you the news that really matters. If you appreciate our Christian journalists and their uniquely truthful reporting and analysis, please help us by becoming a WND Insider!

Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].

SUPPORT TRUTHFUL JOURNALISM. MAKE A DONATION TO THE NONPROFIT WND NEWS CENTER. THANK YOU!