SCOTUS whistleblower admits incident in his book 'possibly' did not happen, then Jordan proves it didn't

U.S. Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. (Image by Mark Thomas from Pixabay)

(FOX NEWS) – A whistleblower who claims that he was tipped off to the decision in a major Supreme Court case before it was published in 2014 admitted Thursday that an incident he described in his new book "may not have" actually happened — then he was played evidence proving it did not.

During a House Judiciary Committee hearing titled, "Undue Influence: Operation Higher Court and Politicking at SCOTUS," Rev. Robert Schenck faced questions from Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, about the circumstances surrounding a separate case involving his brother, Rev. Paul Schenck.

WND is now on Trump's Truth Social! Follow us @WNDNews

"With a single rap of the gavel, Chief Justice William Rehnquist announced: 'We'll hear argument first this morning in Number 95-1056, Reverend Paul Schenck and Dwight Saunders versus Pro-Choice Network of Western New York,'" Robert Schenck wrote in his book, as Jordan showed via placards bearing the text. "Paul and I winked at each other, knowing we had made history with 'Reverend' in his name."

TRENDING: Illegals with driver's licenses: What could go wrong?

Read the full story ›