High court to probe use of drones to search property without warrant

By WND Staff

Members assigned to Naval Information Warfare Center Pacific pilot small camera drones used for data collection as part of the Offensive Swarm-Enabled Tactics (OFFSET) Program at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington, Aug. 10. 2020. (U.S. Navy photo courtesy of Naval Information Warfare Center Pacific)
Members assigned to Naval Information Warfare Center Pacific pilot small camera drones used for data collection as part of the Offensive Swarm-Enabled Tactics (OFFSET) Program at Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington, Aug. 10. 2020. (U.S. Navy photo courtesy of Naval Information Warfare Center Pacific)

The highest court in Michigan has agreed to review a case involving a government’s warrantless search of a privately owned property, by the use of drones.

The Institute for Justice has revealed the Michigan Supreme Court will consider the case involving Todd and Heather Maxon, whose property was targeted by Long Lake Township officials with drones that delivered to them detailed photographs and videos.

The institute explained the issue is whether a government can search a private property – without permission and without a warrant – by using drones.

And then use whatever it thinks it finds in court.

Get the hottest, most important news stories on the Internet – delivered FREE to your inbox as soon as they break! Take just 30 seconds and sign up for WND’s Email News Alerts!

“For two years, Long Lake Township zoning officials flew a sophisticated drone over Todd and Heather Maxon’s property, taking detailed photographs and videos as part of a zoning dispute,” the IJ said.

That, the Maxons and the IJ are arguing, violated the Fourth Amendment and photos and videos obtained cannot be used in court.

“The government cannot intrude on your home with a drone to surveil you—without a warrant—then use the information it gathered against you in court,” explained IJ Attorney Mike Greenberg. “That is precisely the kind of snooping the Fourth Amendment exists to guard against, and we look forward to arguing exactly that to the state supreme court’s justices.”

The IJ explained that Todd spends his free time fixing up vehicles on his five acres. He keeps the vehicles away from public view and he doesn’t bother neighbors.

WND is now on Trump’s Truth Social! Follow us @WNDNews

But zoning officials were infuriated.

“For years, officials have been trying to pin some violation of the zoning code on the Maxons. The government first brought a code enforcement lawsuit against them in 2007, claiming they’d illegally stored ‘junk’ on the property. The Maxons fought the case and won, with the government agreeing to a favorable settlement in which it agreed to drop the lawsuit against them and reimbursed the Maxons for their attorneys’ fees,” the IJ said.

But Long Lake changed its zoning code and used the changes against the Maxons, flying a drone over their property for two years.

With no warrant.

“Now the government wants to use the collected photos and videos as evidence in a zoning enforcement lawsuit to punish the couple for alleged code violations,” the IJ said.

“Like every American, I have a right to be secure on my property without being watched by a government drone,” said Todd. “I’m thrilled the court will be hearing our arguments so that we can vindicate that right for everyone.”

A lower court in Michigan previously had ruled that even if officials violated the Constitution, they still would be allowed to benefit from their illegal actions.

In that court’s view, “any evidence the government uncovers can be used against you in civil code-enforcement proceedings, even if the government deliberately violated your rights when uncovering that evidence.”

IMPORTANT NOTE: “Election denier!” “Science denier!” “Climate-change denier!” “Conspiracy theorist!” And then there’s “hate speech,” “fake news,” “disinformation,” “misinformation,” even something called “MALinformation.” A bizarre new lexicon has been conjured up by America’s elites, the SOLE PURPOSE of which is to discredit and ridicule – and if at all possible, CENSOR ENTIRELY – speech that doesn’t support their increasingly dark and deranged agenda. Tucker Carlson is just the latest.

In the greatest imaginable irony, the nation once boasting the most robust culture of freedom of speech and the press – undergirded by the strongest constitutional protections for those rights – is now ground zero for a total war on free expression.

How could this possibly happen in the United States of America? It’s all explained as never before in the sensational new issue of WND’s critically acclaimed WHISTLEBLOWER magazine, titled “THE ELITES’ ALL-OUT WAR ON FREE SPEECH.” WHISTLEBLOWER is available in both the popular print edition and a state-of-the-art digital version, either single issues or discounted annual subscriptions.

For 25 years, WND has boldly brought you the news that really matters. If you appreciate our Christian journalists and their uniquely truthful reporting and analysis, please help us by becoming a WND Insider!

Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].

Leave a Comment