Supremes rule on gov't schemes to steal Americans' home equity

The Supreme Court has struck down a local law that allowed government officials to steal the equity in a home seized for unpaid taxes – and now the Pacific Legal Foundation, which has fought many such cases, is warning states that still have such laws to get rid of them.

An announcement from the foundation confirmed it dispatched letters to 21 states plus Washington, D.C., demanding "that they change their laws to comply with the recent Supreme Court ruling in Tyler v. Hennepin County."

That declared home equity theft to be unconstitutional. The process has been used by multiple governments to take ownership of a home that has unpaid back taxes. But governments have been taking, like in the recent Minnesota case, a $40,000 property for $15,000 in taxes. They sell the property and keep ALL the money.

Get the hottest, most important news stories on the Internet – delivered FREE to your inbox as soon as they break! Take just 30 seconds and sign up for WND's Email News Alerts!

"Last Thursday, in a major victory for property rights, the Supreme Court ruled that home equity theft is unconstitutional," said Jim Manley, state legal policy deputy director at Pacific Legal Foundation. "This ruling has immediate implications for states that allow home equity theft. If these states don’t change their laws to comply with the court’s ruling, they could face damages in the millions in future lawsuits."

WND reported on the Supreme Court ruling, when it dealt a massive blow to the equity theft practice.

The fight at hand involved a condominium formerly owned by Geraldine Tyler in Hennepin County, Minnesota, but the same facts have played out over and over across the nation in recent years. In fact, some state laws authorized this specific action.

WND is now on Trump's Truth Social! Follow us @WNDNews

Are governments driven by their lust for more money and power?

In this case, Tyler owed about $15,000 in unpaid taxes and penalties, so the county "seized the condo and sold it for $40,000, keeping the $25,000 excess over Tyler's tax debt for itself," the court said.

She sued, charge the county unconstitutionally retained the excess value of her home in violation of the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment and the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment.

Lower courts dismissed her charges.

But the high court's ruling said Tyler plausibly charged the retention of the excess value above her debt violated the Constitution.

The ruling said that the excess value of confiscated property protected by the clause "depends on state law," but state law "cannot be the only one because otherwise a state could 'sidestep the Takings Clause by disavowing traditional property interests' in assets it wishes to appropriate."

"History and precedent dictate that, while the county had the power to sell Tyler's home to recover the unpaid property taxes, it could not use the tax debt to confiscate more property than was due. Doing so effected a 'classic taking in which the government directly appropriates private property for its own use.'"

The PLF said its recent study found 21 states plus Washington, D.C., allow home equity theft in some form.

The foundation said home equity theft is allowed in Alabama, Arizona, Colorado, Illinois, Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, South Dakota, and the District of Columbia. Another nine states allow the theft to go on in some circumstances: Alaska, California, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Ohio, Rhode Island, Texas, and Wisconsin.

It was Chief Justice John Roberts who said in the unanimous ruling, "A taxpayer who loses her $40,000 house to the state to fulfill a $15,000 tax debt has made a far greater contribution to the public fisc than she owed. The taxpayer must render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s, but no more."

IMPORTANT NOTE: “Election denier!” “Science denier!” “Climate-change denier!” “Conspiracy theorist!” And then there’s “hate speech,” “fake news,” “disinformation,” “misinformation,” even something called “MALinformation.” A bizarre new lexicon has been conjured up by America’s elites, the SOLE PURPOSE of which is to discredit and ridicule – and if at all possible, CENSOR ENTIRELY – speech that doesn’t support their increasingly dark and deranged agenda. Tucker Carlson is just the latest.

In the greatest imaginable irony, the nation once boasting the most robust culture of freedom of speech and the press – undergirded by the strongest constitutional protections for those rights – is now ground zero for a total war on free expression.

How could this possibly happen in the United States of America? It’s all explained as never before in the sensational new issue of WND’s critically acclaimed WHISTLEBLOWER magazine, titled “THE ELITES’ ALL-OUT WAR ON FREE SPEECH.” WHISTLEBLOWER is available in both the popular print edition and a state-of-the-art digital version, either single issues or discounted annual subscriptions.

For 25 years, WND has boldly brought you the news that really matters. If you appreciate our Christian journalists and their uniquely truthful reporting and analysis, please help us by becoming a WND Insider!

Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].