A fight has erupted in the state of Missouri over a court’s decision to exclude jurors from a discrimination case because of their faith.
The case, Missouri Department of Corrections v. Finney, now is pending before the U.S. Supreme Court and concerns discrimination based on sexual orientation.
But the fight includes the fact that at the trial court level, three jurors who confirmed they attended a Christian church and followed the Bible’s precepts were excluded because of that faith.
The ADF now has submitted a friend-of-the-court brief to the Supremes advocating for a decision that would reject that discrimination.
“American society has no place for religious tests for civic duty,” explained ADF spokesman John Bursch.
“What happened in Missouri is egregiously wrong and extremely troubling. Even though the prospective jurors made it clear that they would adhere to the law and judge impartially, the trial court ruled that they should be disqualified simply because they subscribe to the Bible’s plain teachings about sex and human sexuality.
“As we explain in our brief, no one would be allowed to reject prospective jurors based on racial stereotypes just to ‘err on the side of caution’ – and rightly so – yet the court rejected these jurors based on religious stereotypes.
“That violates the U.S. Constitution, and we urge the Supreme Court to put a decisive end to this practice.”
The brief argues that the decision was “flagrantly wrong” in light of the Supreme Court’s century-long precedents regarding free exercise and Establishment Clause cases.
The brief notes the Missouri situation is not the first time such religious discrimination has happened, as it also appeared in separate cases in Texas and Minnesota.
There, courts “affirmed striking prospective black jurors based on the prosecutor’s claim that they were struck not because of the race – but because of their religious affiliation.”
The brief explains the Equal Protection Clause “requires our judicial system to treat citizens – including prospective jury members – as individuals and not deny them access to public life based on stereotypical assumptions about their race, religion, sex, or national origin.”
In the Missouri case, prospective jurors were asked if they attended a “hell, fire and brimstone church” where they were taught homosexuality is a sin.
Three prospective jurors said yes, but they all said “everybody sins” and indicated they could be fair and impartial.
The lawyer in the case, however, charged, “There’s no way to rehabilitate somebody” who believes homosexuality is a sin.
Cited was the fact the case involved discrimination based on sexual orientation.
Leaving the problem unaddressed would be to “condone a practice that conflicts with decades of precedent and multiple cases the court has recently decided,” the brief said.
It was “error” for the court to assume that those individuals with religious beliefs would not be able to render a fair and impartial decision.
“If allowed to stand, the decisions … risk slamming the jury box closed to prospective jurors based not on any actual inability to faithfully apply the law, but based on the unfounded assumption that people who hold certain religious beliefs can’t possibly fairly serve on a jury.” And that, it said, is “biased, prejudicial, and approximates a religious test for jury service.”
IMPORTANT NOTE TO WND READERS: Believe it or not, today’s high priests of climate-change apocalypse are correct in predicting that in just a few short years, the earth will become miserable, wretched and almost uninhabitable by human beings. But the grim future they envision won’t come about because of “catastrophic climate change,” but rather, because of the implementation of their completely insane and truly catastrophic agenda.
As Greenpeace co-founder Dr. Patrick Moore recently admitted, “If they actually achieve Net Zero, at least 50% of the population would die of hunger and disease.” Likewise, writes energy expert and author Alex Epstein: “Today’s proposed policies to rapidly eliminate fossil fuel use would, if fully implemented, have truly apocalyptic consequences – making the world an impoverished, dangerous, and miserable place for most people.”
Question: When the scientific case for global warming apocalypse consists primarily of a 1-degree Celsius rise in temperature over more than 130 years, what explains the obsession with an imminent, climate-caused end of the world?
Although many groups have been drawn into the Climate Change Cult – from the news media (which has warned of climate catastrophe, either global warming or a “new ice age,” for over a century!), to innocent school kids indoctrinated by hysterical leftist teachers, to liberal Democrats who claim “climate change” will destroy the earth in a few years – the REAL villains are the national and global elites who KNOW the apocalyptic global warming religion is just a cruel hoax, but promote and exploit it as a means of accomplishing their ultimate goal: Transforming and ruling the world.
The heart and soul of today’s bizarre, pagan climate-change religion, and the global elites’ strategies for using it to rule all of mankind, is powerfully exposed and illuminated in the September issue of WND’s critically acclaimed monthly Whistleblower magazine, an issue titled “CULT OF THE CLIMATE APOCALYPSE: The elites’ breathtaking strategy for ruling the world.” WHISTLEBLOWER is available in both the popular print edition and a state-of-the-art digital version, either single issues or discounted annual subscriptions.
For 25 years, WND has boldly brought you the news that really matters. If you appreciate our Christian journalists and their uniquely truthful reporting and analysis, please help us by becoming a WND Insider!
Content created by the WND News Center is available for re-publication without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].
SUPPORT TRUTHFUL JOURNALISM. MAKE A DONATION TO THE NONPROFIT WND NEWS CENTER. THANK YOU!
