CNN legal analyst warns McAfee ruling would end most prosecutors’ careers

By Around the Web

(Pexels)

By Jason Cohen
Daily Caller News Foundation

Judge Scott McAfee’s ruling against Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis would finish off the career of a typical prosecutor, CNN senior legal analyst Elie Honig said Friday.

Get the hottest, most important news stories on the Internet – delivered FREE to your inbox as soon as they break! Take just 30 seconds and sign up for WND’s Email News Alerts!

McAfee declined to disqualify Willis from the case but said she or her special prosecutor Nathan Wade must step down to resolve an “appearance of impropriety” related to an alleged financial conflict of interest. Honig said the ruling is a victory for Willis, but also noted there are lines in it that are significantly harmful to her reputation.

WATCH:

“If I’m the DA, I’m taking this as a win. It is a win. She has survived,” Honig said. “That is the most important thing here. I‘d be breathing a sigh of relief, but … wow, is there some bruising. Let me just give you the seven, I think, most severe lines and these are really serious findings by the judge about the DA. And these are all verbatim from the opinion.”

“First of all, there’s a ‘significant appearance of impropriety that infects the prosecution team.’ Second, ‘a tremendous lack in judgment.’ Third, ‘the unprofessional manner of the DA’s testimony. Fourth, ‘the odor of mendacity remains.’ I Googled mendacity, it means lying,” Honig said before reading two more lines from the ruling.

“And finally, I think this is the most damning,” Honig added. “‘There are reasonable questions about whether the DA testified untruthfully.’”

Willis’ testimony contained statements about Wade never spending the night at her condo but phone records referenced in a recent court filing seem to show he visited her neighborhood at least 35 times in 2021. The district attorney also erupted in rage about alleged lies when questioned about Wade staying at her house during the February hearing on whether to disqualify her.

“Any one of these statements by a judge would be a career-ender for a normal prosecutor to have an on the record of finding that there are reasonable questions about whether you lied under oath. That would be devastating and we’ll see what the political effects will be,” Honig said.

This story originally was published by the Daily Caller News Foundation.

Content created by The Daily Caller News Foundation is available without charge to any eligible news publisher that can provide a large audience. For licensing opportunities of our original content, please contact [email protected].

SUPPORT TRUTHFUL JOURNALISM. MAKE A DONATION TO THE NONPROFIT WND NEWS CENTER. THANK YOU!

Leave a Comment