Accessory after the fact

• There were never any sex crimes. The right wing has been pushing this fantasy for decades
• Responsible? Of course not! Hillary is the victim of a philandering husband
• No. The evidence for these alleged "sex crimes" is hearsay. How can Hillary be responsible for something we can't prove happened?
• Hillary is guilty only of playing hardball with women who made destructive and legally unprovable accusations against her husband
• This all happened decades ago -- what difference does it make?
• Yes, her refusal to divorce him let him continue to use the cover of their marriage while he preyed on women
• Yes, her motivation for attacking the female victims was different than Bill's, but it was still criminal
• Yes, her intent was clearly to intimidate victims and witnesses and cover up Bill's crimes -- she's a lawyer and knows that's a crime
• Yes, the pattern of her repeated behavior removes all doubt Bill's crimes were committed, and she was an accessory after the fact
• Other

View Results