Just decisions Anything wrong with a pro-life litmus test for Supreme Court? Yes, of course, a litmus test of any kind is inappropriate Yes, Supreme court justices should honor long-established legal precedents like Roe v. Wade Yes, an anti-choice Supreme Court pick would result in women's equality being set back a half-century Yes, there is. if you have that standard, how can you kill (unborn) people off? Not sure, let's ask the 55 million slain unborn No, just as there would've been nothing wrong with asking a post-Civil War Supreme Court nominee about the Dred Scott decision No, Trump campaigned on this very issue No, the right to life is foundational No, how can asking about the most consequential, life-and-death judicial issue of the last century be off limits? Other View Results Loading ...