New evidence Will report of those 72 terror convictions change anything? It shouldn't -- Trump's order was meant to be a ban on a religion It shouldn't -- 72 pales against the much larger number of law-abiding refugees from those countries No -- a Senate report by Sen. Sessions is a biased, political document that can't be trusted No, it needed to he submitted to Robart's court at the beginning -- it's not admissible now No, Trump will make a new order that makes the current blocked one irrelevant It should -- it directly refutes Judge Robart's false claim It might, but it shouldn't matter -- Trump was within his rights to issue the ban It might -- you never know what these judges will do It will at least change public perceptions about Trump and the courts Yes, the new report is Trump's silver bullet Other View Results Loading ...