Unarmed and dangerous Should U.S. military installations be 'gun-free' zones? Yes, everywhere should be a 'gun-free' zone in America Yes, as long as there's an adequate number of armed guards and police, I have no problem prohibiting general weapon possession Yes, guns, tanks, bombs, etc., are the tools of war. That's the only place they should ever be used Yes, more restrictive gun laws - not turning government buildings into armed camps - is the solution No, Fort Hood, the Naval Yard, Columbine, Virginia Tech, Sandy Hook and the Aurora, Colo., movie theater were all 'gun-free zones.' Look where that got us No, just like other gun-free zones, such as public schools, they will continue to attract mass murderers No, many of the people on these installations are our U.S. fighting men and women. If we can't trust them with guns, who can we trust? No, a 'gun-free' military installation is one of the dumbest oxymorons I can think of No, U.S. military installations should be the arsenals of arsenals. Send more guns! Other View Results Loading ...