Foreign Influence and Lobbying Network Hub

In 2019 ITServe hosts Raja, praises him on stage, gives him an award, and publicly highlights his alignment with their immigration priorities.

The HIRE Act: Is not a “competitiveness” or a “STEM education” bill

The HIRE Act is presented as a “competitiveness” and “STEM education” bill. In reality it doubles H-1B numbers, weakens protections that exist today and hardwires long term reliance on foreign labor at the expense of American workers. ITServe Alliance, a visa dependent staffing lobby with deep Indian ties, openly claims credit for introducing the bill and operates as the de facto author and chief promoter.

Sponsored by Congressman Raja Krishnamoorthi, a co-chair of India related caucus activity and a frequent promoter of the U S India “strategic partnership,” the bill aligns with India’s stated goal of expanding its global IT workforce footprint and offshoring model. In 2025, At IT Serve’s 5th Capitol Hill Day they bragged about 145 meetings in a single day with representatives and senators and explicitly promoted the HIRE Act as a “key measure ITServe supports” and wants reintroduced.

Overview of the ITServe Alliance the foreign-aligned network quietly dismantling America’s visa safeguards

ITServe Alliance claims to be a trade association of IT services / staffing firms in the U.S. It describes itself as “the largest association of Information Technology Solutions & Services organizations in the US,” representing 1,200–2,500+ member companies (numbers vary by source over time). Their own materials and Indian diplomatic coverage stress that most member firms have “Indian connection, Indian origin,” serving both U.S. clients and “India back home.”

ITServe Services

ITServe Alliance’s own statements reveal that it is not a neutral trade group but a coordinated lobbying bloc representing more than 2,300 India-origin IT staffing firms that depend heavily on H-1B, L-1 and OPT labor pipelines. ITServe identifies immigration as a core focus area, positioning itself as a “beacon of knowledge” and central hub for sharing visa strategies, legal tactics and methods to maximize foreign-labor access while reducing regulatory oversight. By defining its mission as protecting members’ “common interests,” ITServe effectively acknowledges its role in advancing collective goals such as expanding visa quotas, lowering labor protections and preserving the onshore–offshore model that undercuts American wages. These activities raise major red flags, including potential FARA implications, anti-competition concerns and discriminatory recruitment patterns. Taken together, the organization’s own materials provide direct evidence that ITServe operates as a coordinated industry network whose lobbying and business practices disadvantage American workers.

ITServe Alliance umbrella organization: A coordinated influence and visa-driven ecosystem

ITServe Alliances umbrella organization reveals how they are not a simple trade association. It is a multi-entity ecosystem structured to coordinate business services, immigration benefits, political lobbying and charitable optics, all under one centralized brand. Each branch serves a specific strategic function that aligns with the interests of H-1B–dependent consulting companies.

1. ITServe Alliance (Parent Organization)

Presented as a professional networking association, this entity acts as the public-facing core. It normalizes the alliance as a benign industry group while masking the deeper political and immigration-driven agenda embedded in its sub-organizations.

2. ITServe Services (Member Benefits Engine)

This branch delivers discounted immigration services, payroll systems, recruiting tools, legal resources and other operational supports tailored to visa-heavy IT staffing companies. It functions as the business infrastructure arm of the cartel, strengthening members’ ability to scale visa-based hiring and maintain the labor-broker business model.

3. ITServe CPAC (Political Action Arm)

This is the most consequential branch. ITServe openly acknowledges that CPAC is dedicated to influencing U.S. policy to protect their members’ interests, particularly immigration policies that preserve the H-1B staffing model. This includes lobbying, litigation, regulatory challenges, and direct political engagement.
In practical terms, CPAC is the engine of ITServe’s immigration-policy warfare, coordinating efforts to overturn protections like the Neufeld Memo and push legislation such as the HIRE Act.

4. ITServe CSR (Charitable / Public Relations Arm)

CSR is framed as a charitable organization but is used to build public goodwill, influence local communities, and promote the narrative that ITServe contributes to “local employment” despite the majority of its members relying heavily on foreign labor. This entity provides the PR shield for ITServe’s lobbying agenda and is leveraged to solicit tax-deductible donations that may support influence-building activities, raising potential IRS concerns.

Together, these four entities create a vertically-integrated structure that:

Supports and protects visa-dependent staffing companies
Coordinates legal and political operations to weaken U.S. labor protections
Uses charitable branding to improve public perception and facilitate fundraising
Provides business tools and immigration services that expand foreign-labor pipelines
Concentrates power under one umbrella to operate as a nationwide labor-import cartel

This organizational layout is not accidental, it is strategically designed to strengthen the economic model of H-1B outsourcing while influencing federal policy to ensure its survival.

ITServe Political Advocacy

2013 – ITServe’s history of explicit political coordination and lobbying mobilization

This 2013 ITServe Midwest Chapter email is direct evidence that ITServe was organized from its early days as a political lobbying and fundraising apparatus to protect and expand foreign worker visa pipelines, not as a neutral industry association supporting American jobs.

The language, funding structure, and activities described directly contradict ITServe’s public narrative that it exists to “keep jobs in the U.S.” and instead show coordinated efforts to:

Lobby against U.S. immigration protections
Raise pooled funds from visa-dependent firms
Influence lawmakers on legislation affecting H-1B and related visas
Operate through legal intermediaries to shield donors

1. Explicit Admission of Immigration Lobbying Purpose

“We have an important task ahead of us to support the National Coalition of IT Companies – ITCOSMOS which has been setup in NJ to help fight the immigration issues that are ahead of us which is going to affect most of our members whether you are a H-1B Dependent or H-1B Non Dependent.”

This is a direct admission that ITServe’s membership base is defined by H-1B dependence. The organization exists to fight immigration laws, not comply with them. “Immigration issues” are framed as a threat to members, not to American workers or labor markets. This is advocacy for employer interests, not workforce protections.

Coordinated Fundraising for Lobbying Through a Law Firm

“Please make a note: make checks payable to: Law offices of Rajiv S. Khanna, PC.”

Red flags:

Funds are routed through a law firm rather than a transparent political committee
This structure raises questions about:
Campaign finance compliance
Lobbying disclosure
Donor anonymity

This mirrors classic regulatory-avoidance tactics used to obscure political activity. For investigators, this is a red flag for conduit fundraising.

3. Narrative Engineering to Mask Workforce Composition

“…conveyed that the IT Staffing and Consulting Organizations are not just made up of folks from Indian origin… we have done a lot in that sense.”

Red flags:

This is an admission of image manipulation
The organization is actively trying to obscure its overwhelmingly Indian-origin, visa-dependent makeup
Suggests awareness that the truth would undermine credibility

This evidence suggests intent to mislead policymakers.

ITServe “Global Business Affairs”

Core admission: ITServe operates as an international government-facing intermediary

The Global Business Affairs page contains a direct mission statement that ITServe:

Helps members find new business opportunities around the world such as India
Provides an “easy path” to build relationships with ministers, secretaries and state governments
Acts as a U.S. partner to Indian state governments for creating IT hubs and employment
Plans to replicate these arrangements across multiple Indian states

This is not aspirational language. It is written in the past and present tense and describes executed and ongoing relationships with foreign governments.

Key evidentiary point: ITServe is not merely an industry association. It positions itself as a cross-border business and government liaison, facilitating investment, job creation and infrastructure development outside the United States while operating as a U.S.-based organization.

Quantified foreign job creation is explicitly claimed: The page makes multiple numerical claims:

5,000 jobs created in Andhra Pradesh between 2018–2020
Planned minimum of 10,000 jobs in Telangana
IT hubs, back-offices, and shared office space expansion
Routing of U.S. investments into Indian states, including Tamil Nadu
Ongoing discussions with additional Indian states for back-office operations

These are not framed as theoretical benefits; they are presented as accomplishments and deliverables.

Why this matters: These admissions directly contradict ITServe’s repeated branding as “Empowering Local Employment” in the U.S. The organization openly celebrates foreign employment expansion funded by U.S.-connected member firms.

Structural contradiction: “empowering local employment” vs offshoring facilitation Across the two pages:

Branding slogan: Empowering Local Employment

Operational reality:

Creating IT hubs abroad
Expanding back-office capacity in India
Facilitating international investment flows
Partnering with foreign governments to generate employment outside the U.S.

This is a documented contradiction, not an inferred one.

ITServe’s founding purpose

The ITServe Immigration page contains one of the clearest admissions in the entire archive: ITServe was established in 2010 in response to immigration enforcement. Its existence is tied to protecting the staffing industry from USCIS practices. It explicitly states that the IT and staffing industry depends on the H-1B workforce. It frames USCIS enforcement as “unjust practices” harming the industry. It commits to fighting USCIS interpretations of the law. This page removes any ambiguity about their motives.

Key evidentiary finding:

ITServe self-identifies as an organization created to resist immigration enforcement and expand access to non-immigrant labor for staffing firms.
Employer interests are prioritized, not neutral public interest.
- The immigration page repeatedly references:
  - Protecting small businesses (member firms)
  - Protecting employees (implicitly non-immigrant workers)
  - Opposing enforcement actions that limit staffing flexibility

What is notably absent:

Any reference to U.S. labor displacement
Any acknowledgement of domestic worker availability
Any balancing language regarding U.S. worker protections

Siva Moopanar, President-Elect of ITServe admits that immigration is the backbone of the ITServe member business model. Moopanar states verbatim:

“High skill legal immigration is the backbone of our business, not only our business, and for this country.”

The ITServe Alliance “membership”

ITServe Services

Membership Benefits – ITServe Alliance

Why Join ITServe? – ITServe Alliance

ITServe Alliance presents itself as a normal business association. But when you look closely at what they offer their members, you see something very different. Their membership benefits are not about improving American jobs or helping U.S. workers. Instead, they show that ITServe’s core purpose is to:

1. Make it cheaper and easier for companies to bring in foreign workers through visas like the H-1B. They offer their members:

Discounts on immigration lawyers
Help navigating visa paperwork
Job boards and tools aimed at hiring foreign labor
Discounts for first-time H-1B legal fees

This is not a group trying to create American jobs, it’s a group helping companies rely less on American workers.

2. Protect their members from U.S. government oversight and rules. ITServe has its own political arm (a PAC) and spends member money to:

Fight immigration reforms that protect American workers
Challenge rules that make it harder to outsource jobs
Pressure the government to approve more H-1B visas
Remove protections like the Neufeld Memo, which was designed to stop visa abuse

They openly brag about getting these rules removed and call it a “benefit” for members.

3. Share foreign workers among each other (like a labor pool). One benefit is called:

“Talent Farm” – exchange of resources between members.

“Resources” here means workers. This tells us:

Member companies swap visa workers between each other
They keep workers moving to avoid layoffs or government scrutiny
They operate like a shared labor pool

This kind of system is very harmful to U.S. workers, because it keeps thousands of visa workers circulating through American job markets instead of hiring people already living in the U.S.

4. Train and help companies grow using the offshore labor model. ITServe members are mostly companies that:

Recruit workers from India
Bring them to the U.S. on work visas
Place them at client companies (often replacing Americans)
Send profits back offshore

ITServe provides:

Mentorship
Consulting
Start-up incubators
Insurance
Conferences

All tailored to help more companies join this system. They are essentially teaching companies how to run outsourcing operations more effectively.

Member Benefits – ITServe Alliance

Empowering Members with Exclusive Benefits – ITServe Services

In a ITServe newsletter featuring Makesh Sake, Director of Chapter Relations, openly advertises immigration benefits as the primary membership perk. According to the spotlight, new ITServe members “receive 2 free H-1B filings,” while existing members get discounted H-1B filings as a standard benefit of joining the organization. The pitch frames ITServe membership not around business development or community service, but around subsidized access to U.S. work visas.

It also raises major legal and ethical red flags:

1. Offering “free H-1B filings” as a membership benefit strongly suggests pay-to-play access to immigration sponsorship.
No legitimate U.S. employer should treat visa petitions as a member perk. Immigration filings must be tied to a bona fide job offer, not membership fees.

2. It shows coordinated visa procurement across thousands of companies.
This is classic labor-cartel behavior: centralizing immigration processes to scale up foreign-worker importation.

3. It undermines the legal requirement that H-1B filings be “employment-driven,” not purchased through a club-style network.

4.It demonstrates that ITServe’s business model is inseparable from visa dependency.
Their own marketing proves their mission is not “empowering local employment,” but maximizing foreign-labor pipeline throughput.

ITServe’s membership application:

ITServe Alliance’s membership registration form looks innocuous on the surface, a standard intake form for joining a professional association. But when examined closely, the form confirms exactly what ITServe denies publicly: this is not a typical American business network. This is an organized, India-aligned labor-supply and visa-pipeline syndicate that screens members based on their ability to import foreign workers, place them at third-party sites and operate inside the H-1B/OPT labor-brokerage model. The form asks for almost no information about hiring Americans, local workforce development, STEM commitments, or community involvement. Instead, the mandatory fields reveal the organization’s real priorities: visa volume, outsourcing capability, offshore operations and the infrastructures required for a high-velocity foreign-labor contracting business. What ITServe requires for membership exposes exactly who they are.

Application Link

1. ITServe forces companies to disclose their H-1B workforce

One of the very few required fields on the application is: *“Number of H1B Employees ”

This is not a normal question for a U.S. trade association. But it makes perfect sense for a cartel whose entire business model depends on importing temporary visa workers and deploying them to client sites. ITServe claims to “Empower Local Employment,” yet its membership criteria track only foreign labor counts, not American jobs. This alone contradicts their public branding and confirms their HIRE Act lobbying is self-serving.

2. The form requires disclosure of offshore development centers: A signature of the India-based onshore-offshore model

The application requires companies to reveal whether they offer:

“Offshore Development Services”

No legitimate U.S. business association needs to know this. But offshore services are the cornerstone of India’s labor-export model:

import foreign workers → place onsite
train them in U.S. client environments
transition work offshore to India
replace American employees with cheaper foreign labor

ITServe’s interest in offshore capabilities confirms that they are not representing U.S. businesses, they are representing Indian outsourcing firms operating on U.S. soil. This is the same model federal agencies have repeatedly flagged for wage suppression, job displacement and visa misuse.

3. The form screens for body-shop infrastructure: ATS, HR tools, payroll, job portals, bench-marketing systems

ITServe requires companies to disclose:

ATS systems
HR tools
job portals
payroll systems
accounts tools

These are not normal membership requirements. These are the exact systems needed for:

benching visa workers
rotating workers between client sites
proxy interviews
rapid redeployment
corp-to-corp contracting
paper-contract substitution

In other words: ITServe is validating whether an applicant has the machinery required to operate as an H-1B labor broker. This is the opposite of a “technology association.” It’s a compliance checklist for staffing shops.

4. Applicants must disclose their “Legal/Immigration Services used” meaning ITServe tracks immigration-law pipelines

Nothing about ITServe’s application resembles a legitimate American business association. Instead, it reads like: A labor-import cartel intake form with a visa-pipeline qualification checklist.

Member Benefits: Exclusive ITServe Job Board

Membership Fees

ITServe membership fees & “benefits”

ITServe’s own documents provide some of the strongest self-incriminating evidence showing how ITServe operates as a coordinated lobbying, legal-defense and visa-expansion cartel, not a business association.

Mandatory PAC funding explicitly used to fight U.S. immigration enforcement

“$300 goes to PAC (Policy Advocacy)”

And what does that PAC fund?

Challenging upcoming immigration reform which will eliminate our current consulting model

Passing of HIRE Act

Salary to a Government liaison officer

Salary to a Litigation Attorney

Three years of H-1B approval

Removal of Neufeld Memo / Client letter / Itinerary requirements

Opposed OPT/CPT third-party placements

Reduced 221(g) at the consulates

These are not business services. These are political operations designed to:

Keep the labor-broker outsourcing model alive

Remove U.S. government oversight

Increase foreign-labor access

Reduce protections for American workers

Influence U.S. immigration policy to favor Indian outsourcing companies

They charge their members to fund a political lobbying apparatus specifically aimed at reversing U.S. regulations that protect American workers.

“Challenge the upcoming immigration reform which will ELIMINATE our current consulting model.”

ITServe explicitly acknowledges their consulting model is at risk because of immigration reform.

This means:
- Their business model depends on loopholes
- Their model cannot survive without exploiting visa programs
- They must fight reform because reform would protect Americans and shut them down

This is a confession that ITServe’s business model is incompatible with ethical, lawful and fair employment practices.

The “PAC Achievements” list = Evidence of system manipulation

a. “3 years of H1B approval”

Advocacy to guarantee multi-year approvals is solely beneficial to foreign workers and foreign-run companies.

b. “Removal of Neufeld Memo / Client letter / Itinerary”

This refers to internal USCIS guidance issued following their lawsuit.
It shows:

They directly influenced U.S. immigration policy
They treat policy manipulation as a “member benefit”
They want members to know their litigation changed federal immigration enforcement

These enforcement tools were created to prevent:

H-1B trafficking
third-party placements
staffing abuses
fake client letters

ITServe lobbied to remove anti-fraud safeguards. This may raise FARA concerns, because they are influencing U.S. government policy to serve a predominantly foreign labor interest group.

c. “Opposed OPT/CPT third-party placements”

They opposed restrictions, meaning they supported:

placing foreign students into contract labor
undermining U.S. hiring
circumvention of wage rules
legal loopholes for staffing firms

d. “H1B lottery rule change”

They lobbied for more control over selection, favoring their members.

e. “Historic ITServe memo” / “Reduced 221(g)”

221(g) is used to combat:

sham employers
fake job offers
visa fraud

They celebrated weakening consular scrutiny.

“Savings: Several thousands of USD” They openly value cheaper visa exploitation over compliance with U.S. law or American job protection.

Benefits Structured Around Visa Issuance, Defense & Exploitation

The benefits list shows clear patterns:

IMMIGRATION SERVICES

Discounts on H-1B immigration filings
5% discount on litigation for “corporate law matters”
“First H1B legal fee” discounts

These are not normal business-association perks. They are incentives for companies to:

File more H-1B petitions
Seek bulk-rate legal defense in visa disputes
Challenge USCIS when caught abusing the system
Lower cost of importing foreign labor

ITServe is literally subsidizing visa use, making it easier and cheaper to replace Americans. Visa-reliant body shops operate in bulk, reducing cost per visa to maximize profit margin.

Membership benefits focus on operational tools for body shops

Look at their perks:

Ceipal ATS discount – widely used by H-1B body shops
Dice.com credits – primary recruiting platform for visa workers
LinkedIn recruiting packages – tied to hiring foreign contractors
Payroll services – designed for multi-W2 visa models
Tax filing for “member employees” – often tied to F-1 CPT/OPT workers

These are the business tools of labor brokers running offshore/onsite staffing pipelines. NOT American companies hiring fair and open competition talent.

They bundle “dispute mediation” because members compete for visa workers

This means:

Their member companies frequently fight over H-1B workers
Disputes arise from poaching, benching, or placement issues
They need internal “cartel dispute resolution” mechanisms

This is classic cartel behavior.

Mandatory “CSR Donations” used to influence public opinion and they are encouraging business to claim federal tax exemptions.

They openly claim CSR funds will be used to:

“Convey to the public about our contribution to this country”
“Get ground-level support to our high-skilled immigration policies”
“Get closer to local communities”

This is not charity. It is perception management and political influence.

ITServe’s own materials show that they are soliciting “charitable contributions” under IRS 501(c)(3) status, but the actual stated purpose of these CSR funds contradicts the legal restrictions on charitable nonprofits.

First, here is what ITServe is advertising: “Please consider donating any amount to ITServe Alliance CSR and claim Federal Tax Exemption under IRS 501(c)(3) as part of your business tax planning.”

This is already alarming for several reasons:

1. They are framing charitable donations as a tax-planning strategy

This is not about community benefit or public good. It’s marketed as a business expense loophole.

2. They imply that contributions to their organization, which is politically active, are tax-deductible

If ITServe Alliance CSR is a 501(c)(3), the law is clear:

It cannot engage in political activity.
It cannot support or oppose legislation.
It cannot run political advocacy campaigns.
It cannot fund lobbying or PAC-like efforts.

But their own membership documents show that CSR funds are used to:

“Convey to the public about our contribution to this country”
“Get ground-level support to our high-skilled immigration policies”
“Get closer to local communities” (political optics)
“Lawmakers are appreciating and supporting this program”

These are not charitable activities. These are reputation-building, political-influence and policy-alignment programs.

3. They are comingling CSR messaging with political messaging

CSR (supposedly charitable) is presented side-by-side with PAC political achievements, including:

H-1B approval victories
Removal of Neufeld Memo
Lobbying for HIRE Act
Fighting immigration reforms
Changing H-1B lottery rules

This mixture of:

Political PAC operations, and
Charitable solicitations under 501(c)(3)

is a major red flag for IRS scrutiny and potentially a violation of:

IRS 501(c)(3) political-activity restrictions
IRS 4955 – Excise tax for political expenditures
False solicitation / improper tax-deduction inducement

ITServe Policy Advocacy

Deliberate chapter expansion tied to political power

Statements by Siva Moopanar explicitly link chapter growth to organizational strength and influence:

Targets are set for 100–200 member companies per chapter
Expansion across Boston and New England is framed as a way to make chapters “powerful”
Growth is presented as strategic, not organic

This establishes intentional scaling of a coordinated trade organization, not a loose professional association. Membership growth is treated as leverage.

Consolidation strategy to influence immigration policy

Anju Vallabhaneni reinforces the same strategy: “If you are not at the table, you will be on the menu”

Calls for unity and expansion to gain “a lot of say in immigration policies.” Explicit linkage between membership growth and policy influence.

This is a classic trade-association power-building model, where:

Scale equals leverage
Leverage equals regulatory influence

This is self-described by ITServe leadership.

Immigration advocacy is the organizing principle, not a side issue

From 2016 onward, ITServe explicitly states that:

It reaches out to elected officials, media, and agencies to address immigration needs of member companies
Its policy work focuses on reducing regulatory burdens and expanding visa flexibility
Its success stories include weakening Neufeld Memo enforcement and removing client-letter requirements

These are self-reported lobbying achievements, not external interpretations

Policy advocacy success stories admit regulatory rollbacks

ITServe’s “Policy Advocacy Success Stories” page lists:

Removal of client-letter requirements
Reduced end-client disclosure obligations
Easier movement of H-1B workers between client sites
Expanded flexibility benefiting consulting firms

These outcomes align precisely with the business model of labor-brokerage and body-shop firms, not domestic workforce protection. Taken together, this establishes that ITServe achieved policy wins that weakened visa safeguards.

ITServe’s “PAC Achievements”

ITServe Alliance openly brags that it sued the U.S. Government repeatedly to dismantle safeguards designed to protect American jobs, American wages and workplace integrity.

What ITServe’s “Successes” means for American workers

1. Reversing OPT I-983 Restrictions (Third-party placement)

What they sued for: To let foreign OPT students (F-1 visa holders) work at third-party client sites, even when the employer does not provide training or supervision.
Why this harms Americans:
- Allows outsourcing firms to treat OPT students like temporary contract labor, not “students in training.”
- Employers hire these workers instead of American graduates, because OPT workers cost 20–40% less and give employers a 15% tax exemption.
- It expands the pipeline of cheap, disposable foreign labor flowing straight into body-shop chains.

Bottom line: This directly replaces young American STEM graduates with low-wage visa workers.

Evidence Link

2. Canceling client-letter requirements

What they sued for: To stop USCIS from requiring proof of real work at a real job site before approving a visa.
Why this harms Americans:
- Allows foreign staffing companies to submit fake contracts, hypothetical projects, or vague statements to get visas approved.
- Eliminates the evidence needed to detect fraud or ghost-contract H-1Bs.
- Floods the labor market with workers not tied to a specific job, enabling wage suppression.

Bottom line: They removed verification that prevented fraud, opening the door to mass visa approvals for non-existent jobs.

3. Stopping the DOL wage rule (Higher wages for H-1B)

What they sued for: To block the rule requiring H-1B employers to pay higher, market-rate wages. ITServe brags the rule was “devastating” because no one could afford to pay higher wages.
Why this harms Americans:
- H-1B workers remain cheaper than Americans, ensuring companies prefer foreign labor.
- Keeps wage levels artificially low across entire tech sectors.
- Prevents upward pressure on salaries for American workers.

Bottom line: They fought to keep foreign labor cheap so cartel members can undercut Americans.

4. Preserving the Old H-1B Lottery Rules

What they sued for:To block reforms that would have prioritized higher-skilled, higher-paid workers in the H-1B lottery.
Why this harms Americans:
Keeps the lottery random, allowing bulk submissions, duplicate entries and mass fraud.
Enables staffing firms to dominate H-1B selection by filing 10–100 entries per worker.
Locks out legitimate employers who would hire genuinely skilled labor.

5. Killing the 2010 Neufeld Memo

What is the 2010 Neufeld memo

The 2010 Neufeld Memo is a landmark policy document issued by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) on January 8, 2010, signed by Donald Neufeld, Associate Director of Service Center Operations. Titled “Determining the Employer-Employee Relationship for Adjudication of H-1B Petitions,” it is one of the most important federal directives ever created to combat H-1B visa abuse, outsourcing and labor trafficking schemes.

Neufeld Memo Link

ITServe Alliance, Inc. v. USCIS LINK

Purpose of the Neufeld Memo

The memo was created to stop staffing firms, labor brokers, and outsourcing companies from exploiting the H-1B visa to displace American workers. Its core purpose:

Prevent abuse of the H-1B program by ensuring a real, legal employer-employee relationship exists.

USCIS wrote the memo because:

Thousands of H-1B petitions were being filed by body shops and offshore-outsourcing companies that did not actually control the worker.
H-1B workers were being rented out to third-party sites, undercutting wages and eliminating U.S. jobs.
Employers were filing speculative applications for jobs that didn’t exist, just to get cheap labor in the pipeline.

How the Neufeld Memo was designed to protect the American workforce

1. It targeted the labor-broker model, the heart of outsourcing and visa abuse

The memo directly challenged companies (like many ITServe members today) that:

Do not have real worksites
Do not directly supervise workers
Simply “place” H-1Bs on client contracts like leased labor

This model is the backbone of the U.S. offshoring industry, which systematically replaces Americans.

By restricting third-party placement, the memo aimed to shut down a major displacement mechanism.

2. It banned speculative hiring

The memo said an H-1B could NOT be approved unless the employer could show:

The job actually exists
The employer has work available at the time of filing
The employer has control over the job duties

This was meant to prevent companies from stockpiling cheap labor to deploy later — directly protecting U.S. job seekers.

3. It established the “Right to Control” test

To ensure American workers were not displaced by contract labor, the memo required employers to prove they had:

Control over when, where, and how the H-1B worker performs the job
The ability to hire, fire, supervise, and pay the worker
Real, ongoing oversight of daily work

This made it much harder for staffing companies and Indian outsourcing firms to exploit the system.

4. It cracked down on offsite placement

USCIS explicitly stated:

H-1Bs deployed to client sites are at high risk for abuse
Evidence must be provided for every worksite
Employers must provide contracts, statements of work, itineraries, and supervision plans
This was designed to stop the replacement of Americans at:
Disney
Southern California Edison
Abbott
Accenture-run contracts
Infosys, Tata, Wipro placements
…and thousands of similar cases.

5. It strengthened enforcement tools to prevent wage suppression

By forcing employers to prove real control, the memo:

Reduced misclassification
Reduced “benching”
Reduced below-market wages
Reduced abuses of “Level 1” H-1B wages

This directly protected Americans from wage suppression caused by the labor-broker model.

6. It made it easier for USCIS to deny fraudulent petitions

The memo formalized what evidence adjudicators could demand, including:

Full organizational charts
Proof of internal supervision
Real employment agreements
Documentation for each client location

This allowed USCIS to deny thousands of fraudulent staffing-company petitions, protecting U.S. workers from replacement.

Why the Memo Matters Today
The Neufeld memo was the federal government’s attempt to:

Protect Americans from outsourcing
Disable the illegal H-1B labor-broker system
Stop labor cartels from exploiting visa loopholes
Rein in firms whose business model depends on replacing U.S. workers

The Neufeld Memo was intentionally designed to:

Stop visa mills
Stop fraudulent speculative petitions
Stop offshore-outsourcing firms from flooding the market
Stop the replacement of U.S. workers by contract H-1Bs
Promote compliance with U.S. labor laws
Strengthen USCIS’s ability to deny abusive filings

It was one of the strongest federal efforts ever made to protect the American labor force from the outsourcing industry.

ITServe Alliance aggressively fought the Neufeld Memo as well as the 2018 USCIS Policy Memos because it directly targeted their business practices.

Their lawsuits sought to:

Remove the right-to-control test
Restore third-party placement
Allow speculative H-1Bs
Reduce evidence requirements
Gut USCIS oversight

ITServe’s entire political lobbying structure (including the HIRE Act) is built on overturning the restrictions that protected U.S. workers.

H-1B landscape post ITServe V, USCIS Settlement Link

Source Link | Link

2018 USCIS Policy Memo Targets H-1B Petitions Involving Off-Site Employment Link| Link| Link Settlement Text Link

“2,500 companies that represent ITServe Alliance, mostly with Indian connection, Indian origin”

The USCIS “ITServe Memo” https://www.uscis.gov/sites/default/files/USCIS/Laws/Memoranda/2020/PM-602-0114_ITServeMemo.pdf

ITServe anti-American lawsuits continued

Story Link Link Link

ITServe filed this lawsuit on behalf of their members who even according to the lawsuit are companies whose business model relies on replacing American workers. The lawsuit is brought on behalf of “50/50 companies,” firms where more than 50 percent of the workforce is on H-1B or L-1 visas.

These companies:

Do not primarily hire Americans
Depend on a pipeline of foreign labor
Operate visa-based staffing models that undercut U.S. wages
Compete unfairly with American workers who cannot legally work for less

By demanding a $350 million payout they are effectively asking the USCIS to subsidize companies that exclude American citizens from their own job market.

The lawsuit claims USCIS collected “unlawful” fees, but those fees existed precisely because:

Congress wanted to discourage excessive H-1B use
The fees were intended to protect domestic labor
The funds allowed USCIS to process and investigate visa petitions for fraud

ITServe wants all of that undone. This flips the purpose of visa oversight on its head and directly harms Americans whose jobs depend on meaningful enforcement.

* Links may no longer work due to ITServe taking down their newsletters from public view: Evidence Link | Link

Even U.S. consulates have felt the consequences. A recent Center for Immigration Studies interview with Ms. Siddiqui, a former consular officer stationed in Chennai, a post that adjudicated 220,000 H-1B visas and 140,000 H-4 visas in 2024, revealed that fraudulent degrees, fake employment records and fabricated client letters were a daily occurrence.

What Siddiqui described from inside the consulate aligned perfectly with ITServe’s internal documents, fraud had not simply slipped through the cracks, it had been engineered, normalized and defended. She explained how consular officers struggled to enforce basic quality control because they were under-resourced, blocked by bureaucratic obstacles and confronted with pressure from local interests, foreign political actors and what she called a “very effective Indian lobby in the U.S.” That dynamic mirror the same shadow lobbying ecosystem in which ITServe has operated for years, dominating the space through relentless litigation, targeted lobbying and sustained pressure on federal agencies to dismantle core safeguards such as 221(g) administrative processing.

Internal ITServe documents show the organization had their litigation attorney pressure federal agencies, challenge enforcement rules and influence U.S. consulates overseas. The organization openly listed the removal of client letters and the reduction of 221(g) administrative processing and other anti-fraud safeguards as major PAC achievements.

In reality, 221(g) should be one of the easiest safeguards for any legitimate business to satisfy. When a consular officer issues a 221(g) request, they are simply asking the petitioning company to provide basic evidence that the job is real, the worksite exists, the client relationship is genuine or the project actually requires the worker being sponsored. For reputable employers, these documents, statements of work, contracts, organizational charts, supervision plans or project descriptions, are routine parts of everyday operations.

Honest companies can produce them almost instantly because they already exist as part of normal business activity. The only entities that struggle to comply with 221(g) are those attempting to place visa workers into speculative jobs, shell contracts or client sites where no real supervision or job duties have been secured. In other words, 221(g) does not burden legitimate employers, it exposes illegitimate ones. That is precisely why certain lobbying groups fought so aggressively to weaken it: not because 221(g) created hardship for compliant companies, but because it made fraud easier to detect.

Siddiqui’s testimony therefore did more than expose H-1B fraud, it exposed the results of ITServe’s long-running campaign to erode oversight, weaken consular review and expand the visa pipeline for outsourcing firms. The fraud she witnessed firsthand was the very fraud ITServe had paid attorneys to institutionalize, fought USCIS to preserve and lobbied Congress to expand. Her account confirmed that the breakdown inside the H-1B system was not accidental; it was the outcome of a coordinated, years-long effort to dismantle American safeguards in favor of a foreign labor agenda.

ITServe labor brokerage “inventory + salesforce” model: There was never a worker shortage

Year-by-year ITServe “Welcome” page snapshot: 2015-2020

The above snapshot shows the ITServe member companies, recruiters, active jobs and active resumes with a year-by-year snapshot of the totals they presented on their homepage.

1) The numbers show a labor-brokerage “inventory + salesforce” model, not a direct-employment model

Across every snapshot, ITServe’s ecosystem looks like a staffing marketplace:

Recruiters scale almost perfectly with member-company count (roughly ~4 recruiters per company every year).
Recruiters often exceed jobs (meaning a very large “sales” layer relative to real positions).
Resumes significantly exceed jobs in multiple years (meaning “available supply” is larger than “active demand”).

The raw totals (from the image)

11/27/2015: 221 companies | 968 recruiters | 1,029 jobs | 770 resumes
12/04/2016: 579 companies | 2,621 recruiters | 1,944 jobs | 3,667 resumes
12/19/2017: 805 companies | 3,737 recruiters | 2,202 jobs | 6,015 resumes
04/24/2018: 923 companies | 4,167 recruiters | 4,904 jobs | 7,431 resumes
04/26/2019: 1,112 companies | 4,604 recruiters | 1,471 jobs | 8,680 resumes
02/10/2020: 1,256 companies | 5,192 recruiters | 1,918 jobs | 8,734 resumes

2) “No shortage” is supported by the bench-to-job ratios (their own posted stats)

The most probative indicator is resumes per active job (available supply vs. posted demand).

2016: 3,667 resumes / 1,944 jobs ≈ 1.89 resumes per job
2017: 6,015 / 2,202 ≈ 2.73 resumes per job
2018: 7,431 / 4,904 ≈ 1.52 resumes per job
2019: 8,680 / 1,471 ≈ 5.90 resumes per job ← explodes
2020: 8,734 / 1,918 ≈ 4.55 resumes per job

Why 2019–2020 is particularly damaging (for “shortage” narratives)

Between 2018 → 2019:

Active jobs collapse: 4,904 → 1,471 (down ~70%)
Resumes increase: 7,431 → 8,680 (up ~17%)
Recruiters increase: 4,167 → 4,604 (up ~10%)

That pattern is exactly what you see in a brokerage / bench / pipeline operation. When demand drops, a normal employer shrinks hiring infrastructure. A labor broker keeps recruiters and expands inventory because the business is placing labor, not building a stable internal workforce.

3) Recruiter-heavy structure reinforces “brokerage” over “employment”

Recruiters per job (sales capacity relative to real openings):

2016: 2,621 / 1,944 ≈ 1.35 recruiters per job
2017: 3,737 / 2,202 ≈ 1.70 recruiters per job
2019: 4,604 / 1,471 ≈ 3.13 recruiters per job
2020: 5,192 / 1,918 ≈ 2.71 recruiters per job

A legitimate “we can’t find workers” story doesn’t align with multiple recruiters per job plus thousands of ready resumes.

4) Why this supports “foreign labor pipeline expansion” vs. filling real shortages

Using only what’s on this page, the internal logic looks like this:

They maintain a large ready labor inventory (resumes/bench).
They maintain a large sales apparatus (recruiters).
They report relatively fewer real openings (jobs), especially in 2019–2020.
Therefore their push for “more visa access” aligns more with pipeline throughput and labor supply control than unmet demand.

This does not count offshored jobs, meaning the true displacement/transfer component isn’t even captured here, this is only the U.S.-facing placement layer. This evidence set is strongest as “their own published operational metrics” showing excess supply + bench capacity while lobbying for expanded work authorization.

5) Immigration program abuse indicators (DOL/USCIS)

These metrics support targeted audits for:

benching patterns
nonproductive time issues
client placement dependency
labor-condition compliance

Benefit from diversity with no diversity

Leader board:

Evidence is from a 2023 ITServe Newsletter which has since been taken down by ITServe.

Citizenship-status and national-origin discrimination red flags

Vinay Mahajan, ITServe President 2023, repeatedly emphasizes:

Its origins in a “heavily Telugu community”
That “Telugu… dominate the IT sector in general” and that the group is now dominated by Indians and other South Asians.

What you have is a membership base that is overwhelmingly foreign-born and visa-dependent with a business model (IT staffing and consulting) who based on this investigation make hiring decisions that clearly show they prefer foreign visa-holders over U.S. citizens. This is exactly where 8 U.S.C. § 1324b ( Unfair-immigration-related employment practices statute) should come into play. The document repeatedly states that ITServe’s first mission is to protect members’ interests and obtain immigration benefits, not to ensure lawful, non-discriminatory access to jobs for U.S. workers. That creates a strong inference that policy positions are driven by the economic desires of visa-employing members, not by compliance with 1324b or the INA’s domestic-worker protections.

External evidence which shows a lack of diversity with nearly 100% Indian-national or Indian-origin executives. This is an ethnically homogeneous, industry-specific special interest group whose operations overwhelmingly advantage one nationality while systematically excluding U.S. workers.

ITServe Chapter Members

ITServe CSR: Charity or political instrument?

The disconnect between ITServe’s public image and its documented activities becomes even sharper when examining how the organization solicits and deploys “charitable contributions.” ITServe Alliance CSR, the group’s affiliated 501(c)(3) nonprofit, issued year-end appeals encouraging businesses to donate and “claim Federal Tax Exemption” under IRS charitable rules. One solicitation reads:

This messaging is striking for several reasons, each of which raises serious compliance concerns.

Traditional nonprofits emphasize public benefit.
ITServe emphasizes tax deductions.

By presenting charitable contributions as a “business tax planning” tool, the organization reframes philanthropy as a financial loophole, a tone at odds with IRS expectations for organizations receiving tax-exempt status.

More concerning are the stated purposes of CSR funds. According to ITServe’s own membership materials, CSR dollars are used to:

“Convey to the public about our contribution to this country”
“Get ground-level support to our high-skilled immigration policies”
“Get closer to local communities” to improve public opinion
Develop programs “lawmakers are appreciating and supporting”

None of these objectives align with the legal definition of charitable purpose. The second line, “Get ground-level support to our high-skilled immigration policies”, is explicitly political, falling under issue advocacy and policy influence. Under IRS rules, a 501(c)(3) organization is absolutely prohibited from engaging in political activity, including supporting or opposing legislation or conducting grassroots lobbying campaigns.

Yet ITServe markets CSR as part of a broader strategy to improve perceptions of high-skilled immigration and build public sympathy for its policy positions.

What makes the arrangement more troubling is that ITServe routinely presents CSR (its “charity” arm) alongside PAC operations responsible for lobbying, litigation and immigration-policy battles. This proximity blurs any meaningful line between charitable activity and political campaigning. In some materials, CSR solicitations and political successes appear side by side, suggesting a unified operation rather than two independent entities separated by legal boundaries.

If CSR funds advertised as tax-deductible and are used to advance immigration-policy messaging or to bolster support for legislative initiatives like the HIRE Act, the organization could face exposure under:

IRS 501(c)(3): Prohibits any political activity, including issue advocacy intended to influence public opinion on legislation.
IRS 4955: Imposes excise taxes on political expenditures by 501(c)(3) entities.

Even the appearance of using charitable solicitations to support lobbying operations can draw IRS scrutiny. For ITServe the evidence is not ambiguous: CSR is described by ITServe itself as a tool for shaping perceptions of immigration policy and building political support.

Use of CSR and STEM spending to build political goodwill

ITServe Leadership is openly stating:

More money and time are being spent on STEM
Lawmakers and leaders “are appreciating our efforts”
CSR is explicitly tied to reputation and goodwill

CSR is framed as a strategic influence mechanism, not merely philanthropy.

Money ITServe Alliance Inc pushes into CSR

ITServe Alliance Inc’s 990: Link

Irving, TX Tax-exempt since May 2017
EIN: 27-1870521

ITServe Alliance Inc’s CSR 990: Link

Coppell, TX Tax-exempt since June 2020

EIN: 84-3887477

2023

2023 (FY ending 12/31/2023) ITServe 501(c)(6)
2023 (FY ending 12/31/2023) ITServe CSR CSR 501(c)(3)

2022

2022 (FY ending 12/31/2022) ITServe 501(c)(6)
2022 | IRS Link (FY ending 12/31/2022) ITServe CSR 501(c)(3)

Additional evidence:

ITSERVE 2021
ITSERVE CSR 2021
ITSERVE 2020
ITSERVE CSR 2020

Monopolizing the IT industry

India benefits from ITServe’s CSR

EZJobs “Employment Support Architecture” for ITServe Alliance CSR

The announcement states that EZJobs partnered with ITServe Alliance to provide a “free employment platform” as part of ITServe’s CSR initiative, aimed at helping community members who lost jobs during COVID.

Key claims include:

Free access to EZJobs for “community members”
Direct resume visibility to ITServe member companies
Positioning ITServe as a benevolent employment intermediary
Framing the effort as pandemic relief and humanitarian assistance

EZJobs + CSR = controlled labor routing architecture:

Builds a member-only hiring platform
Brands it as CSR
Routes resumes only to ITServe companies
Explicitly references companies with offshore offices in India

The “CSR initiative” is explicitly tied to member companies with offshore operations in India, meaning:

Employment pathways are anchored to India-based labor ecosystems
CSR branding is used to legitimize offshore labor integration
The program is not neutral or domestic-worker focused

This is vertical integration: recruitment → visas → offshoring → lobbying → lawmaking. CSR is the camouflage layer.

Key actors:

Raghu Chittimalla – National President, ITServe
Goutham Goli – National CSR Director, ITServe
Jyoti Vazirani – Co-founder, EZJobs and PR Director of ITServe

Evidence of coordinated labor-market manipulation. This program:

Centralizes job seekers
Restricts employer access to ITServe members
Operates alongside visa-heavy firms
- Was launched during mass U.S. layoffs

This fits labor cartel characteristics, not charitable relief.

Misuse of CSR designation

CSR is traditionally charitable and non-commercial.

Here it is used to:

Feed resumes into private staffing firms
Support companies with offshore delivery models
Maintain labor supply continuity

This raises:

IRS scrutiny issues (for nonprofit activities)
State consumer protection concerns
False or misleading representations to the public

The first mission of ITServe is always protect member’s interest

Evidence is from a 2023 ITServe Newsletter which has since been taken down by ITServe.

Across the pages, Vinay Mahajan makes several things clear:

ITServe’s first mission is to protect and secure benefits for its members, not to benefit the U.S. labor market or American workers. “High-skilled immigration is very important to ITServe members.” The association’s central policy goal is expanding and protecting immigration pipelines (H-1B, OPT, STEM, etc.). They litigate to strike down USCIS safeguards (client-letter rules, internal regulations, short-term approvals, 221(g) delays, OPT third-party restrictions).

They lobby Congress and specific named lawmakers for:

Higher H-1B quotas
Special exemptions from caps for certain foreign nationals
More freedom to use OPT students at third-party client sites

They emphasize their collective power, networking, and WhatsApp coordination, where members share resources, “such as personnel,” and get immigration advice, often from sponsor immigration attorneys.

Repeated statements that “high skilled immigration is very important to ITServe members” and that they lobby for higher H-1B quotas and more OPT placements are a red flag when combined with the existing legal requirements:

H-1B is supposed to be for temporary specialty-occupation shortages, not as a permanent pipeline for body-shops or labor cartels.
OPT employment is supposed to be “training directly related to the student’s major” and primarily for the benefit of the student, not as a cheap staffing pool for third-party clients.

ITServe boasts about:

Suing to allow OPT students to work at third-party organizations.
Suing over client-letter and itinerary requirements and short-term approvals that USCIS used as tools against staffing-company abuse.
Suing over 221(g) processing holds, which are often used when consular officers suspect fraud or need more evidence.

Those lawsuits themselves are not illegal, everyone can challenge agency action, but the goal is explicitly to weaken guardrails designed to prevent:

Benching and unpaid time
Third-party placement without clear employer-employee control
Fraudulent end-client claims
Sham “training” arrangements for OPT students

That aim should draw scrutiny under the Immigration and Nationality Act and its regulations (e.g., 8 U.S.C. § 1182(n); 8 C.F.R. § 214.2; 20 C.F.R. part 655) because it signals a coordinated effort to preserve exactly the kinds of structures that have been repeatedly flagged in enforcement actions against staffing firms.

OPT third-party placement

They brag about overturning a “restriction that prevented OPT students from working at third-party organizations,” calling the result a “victory” that “allow[ed] the recruitment of OPT students for various job opportunities.”

Regulatory red flags:

OPT is a student benefit, not an employer’s staffing program.
Third-party placement models are the same structure DHS has associated with visa mills and labor-brokering.

When a trade group openly reengineers policy so that its members can recruit more OPT students into client-site roles, it raises questions about:

Unauthorized employment (if real training is thin or non-existent)
Wage-and-hour compliance
Whether these programs are being used to bypass H-1B caps, labor-condition attestations, and prevailing-wage rules

How ITServe’s litigation dismantled the very safeguards meant to stop ITServe-style abuses

ITServe Alliance spent years suing the U.S. government to dismantle the core protections designed to prevent visa abuse, third-party labor brokering, and fake “on-site” employment, the exact practices that ITServe member companies openly market today.

Evidence Link | Link | Link | Link

ITServe spent years attacking the very safeguards designed to prevent labor-brokerage models, fraudulent job placements and visa-pipeline recruiting. Now, ITServe’s own members openly engage in the exact practices those protections were meant to stop. This case study shows that ITServe’s litigation did not simply weaken oversight, it directly enabled the illegal and unfair practices its own members now publicize as their business model.

“Just as with any members Association, the first mission is always to protect members’ interest. And, the second thing is, of course, because of our collective
power, we are able to get benefits for our members. “ VINAY MAHAJAN PRESIDENT OF ITSERVE

ITServe frames itself as a protector against “external threats”

ITServe frames itself as a protector against “external threats” including adversarial stance against U.S. immigration enforcement.

In context, “external threats” refers to:

USCIS
FDNS fraud investigations
Department of State
federal enforcement
potential criminal exposure for collusion

This is critically important for DOJ/OIG because it shows intent to insulate an industry from legal accountability.

“Considering the recent H1B 2023 and 2024 CAP multiple registrations…” This refers to the massive nationwide H-1B fraud wave exposed by Bloomberg where:

shell companies
staffing firms
coordinated networks

submitted multiple registrations for the same Indian beneficiary to increase lottery odds. USCIS itself stated publicly that the fraud was egregious and involved collusive behavior.

ITServe legal counsel Jonathan Wasden gives protective instructions

This is clearly legal risk containment and not compliance ethics. Wasden “has put together best practices” and is advising, “Do not file any application this year if there is any suspicion of collision [collusion]…” This advice is not framed as ethical guidance; it is framed as risk avoidance, so members do not trigger audits or investigations.

They emphasize “whether intentional or inadvertent.” This is damage control for widespread misconduct within their own network. They issue a warning not to file if they suspect “collision/collusion.” This is the most direct admission, “Do not file any application this year if there is any suspicion of collision, whether intentional or inadvertent.”

Why this is incriminating:

A trade association only warns members not to commit a crime if the members have already been doing it. USCIS warned of massive fraud in 2023 and 2024, ITServe’s own counsel is now telling members not to do what many of them have already done. The memo states “Jonathan Wasden has put together some best practices in this regard, including various collusion scenarios during our recent sessions with members across the board.” Confirming members brought collusion scenarios forward, the issue is occurring “across the board” meaning it is widespread inside ITServe companies and ITServe is addressing collusion as an internal problem.

ITServe has engaged in national-level lobbying on H-1B fraud

They list actions they already took:

Sending letters to U.S. Senate & House Judiciary Committee
National webinars to shape internal compliance messaging
Hosting lawyers to assist companies in avoiding prosecution
Communicating with immigration attorneys to unify their stance

This is coordinated political and legal influence, not normal trade association behavior.

The document exposes widespread fear of USCIS’s new fraud detection system. “USCIS possesses advanced technology capable of identifying collusions.” Meaning USCIS’s new detection systems now threaten their core business model. The entire document does not reflect how a legitimate industry behaves. This is how a criminally vulnerable network behaves when enforcement tightens.

A newly surfaced video from an ITServe Alliance event reveals a shocking moment in which an ITServe-affiliated lawyer:

Encourages violence against the President, urging members to kick his “a##.”
Declares that the President isn’t god and doesn’t make the rules. the United States does not make the rules.
Assures ITServe’s network that U.S. immigration enforcement cannot touch them.

This is not a fringe activist or anonymous commenter. The remarks were made on stage, at an ITServe-organized event, before an audience of visa-reliant outsourcing executives. ITServe is not a harmless business association. It is an aggressive, foreign-aligned lobbying cartel openly boasting that it can override U.S. law. And now it is on video. The messaging in that clip, violence, defiance of U.S. authority and promises to “protect immigration” for their members, exposes the true posture of ITServe: A politically active, foreign-benefiting pressure bloc that believes it can control U.S. immigration policy.

Video Link

ITServe’s India

“Empowering Local Employment”

ITServe Alliance publicly brands itself as “empowering local employment” while simultaneously positioning itself as a lobbying and coordination hub for skilled immigration pipelines that primarily benefit its member firms and India-linked outsourcing interests. The evidence highlights ITServe’s direct engagement with U.S. immigration policy, its explicit framing of “high-skill immigration as the backbone” of its business model and its role in educating members on recruiting, immigration and workforce strategies.

At the same time, evidence reveals ITServe’s active partnerships with Indian state governments, promotion of business expansion into India and member benefits tied directly to H-1B filings and visa processing discounts. Collectively, this evidence contradicts ITServe’s local-jobs narrative and instead shows an organization structured to protect and expand foreign labor pipelines, influence immigration policy and normalize the use of visa-dependent staffing models under the guise of industry advocacy and workforce development.

ITServe is positioning itself not as a U.S. trade association, but as an official partner of a foreign government, actively helping India build its IT infrastructure while lobbying U.S. lawmakers for expanded access to American visas and labor pipelines. ITServe is working directly with a foreign government on economic development. The AP government allocated 10 acres of land to ITServe to build tech infrastructure in Visakhapatnam (Vizag), with an option for 40 more acres if ITServe meets job-creation targets in India. This is not normal for a U.S.-based nonprofit. This demonstrates a foreign industrial partnership, not U.S. domestic advocacy. It proves ITServe’s job creation is happening in India not in America.

Centers of excellence on foreign government land = offshore IT hubs.

The initiative explicitly states job creation in Andhra Pradesh. ITServe says the project will create: 10,000–15,000 jobs in India not in America. Centers of excellence tied to job creation targets in India are, by definition, offshore delivery centers. India has repeatedly stated through CII, NASSCOM, and AP government releases that its goal is to become the world’s back-office and AI powerhouse. These “centers of excellence” support:

India’s AI leadership strategy
India’s digital governance export model
India’s IT-enabled services expansion

Not American workers.

The 10 acres being allocated by the Andhra Pradesh government, the job-creation targets in India and ITServe’s role in promoting Vizag as a preferred global IT destination all show that ITServe is executing an economic development initiative for a foreign government. Under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), any U.S. organization that:

partners with a foreign government,
promotes that government’s economic or political interests, or
influences U.S. policy while advancing foreign objectives

is required to register as a foreign agent.

By helping India build AI, data, and digital governance hubs, while lobbying Congress for more H-1Bs and green cards to feed India’s offshore workforce, ITServe is operating in the exact zone FARA was designed to regulate.

These “centers of excellence” are not neutral tech projects. They are infrastructure for India’s offshore IT industry, built with the assistance of a U.S.-based group that simultaneously pressures U.S. lawmakers to expand the very visa pipelines that feed that industry. This is a textbook dual-role scenario:

Build India’s workforce abroad.
Expand India’s labor pipeline into the U.S.
Lobby U.S. policymakers while advancing a foreign government’s objectives.

That combination creates serious FARA exposure for ITServe.

ITServe’s leadership and foreign partnerships, including a land grant and tech hub deal with the government of Andhra Pradesh, raise serious FARA red flags and show this is part of a foreign industrial strategy, not a neutral trade association initiative

ITServe Members

ITServe leadership

ITServe Founding Members

Satish Manduva – ITServe Founding President/Member & CEO Intellisoft and Board Member, U.S. India Chamber of Commerce DFW, & President/Founder/Officer of e3 global inc., InfowareTech Inc., MSKV Technologies Inc, Chariot Capital LLC, SSRAM Capital LLC, INDIAN AMERICAN FAMILIES FEDERATION, and Farmers Luna Hub LLC

InfowareTech Inc.

Shared Staffing company with fellow founding Member Shashidhar Devireddy

Shashidhar Devireddy – ITServe Founding Member – Director/Officer ITServe Alliance India Association – President (2016) – Governing Board Chair (2021) – Governing Board Member (2016-2023) & CEO Founder Lucid Technologies (Lucid Jobs), RAVES.ai, InfowareTech Inc., Unitedsoft Inc., Impressive Systems Inc., Near Shore Resources Pvt Ltd India, Sha & Sid (S&S) Constructions Pvt Ltd India, 70MM Entertainments Pvt Ltd India,

Lucid Jobs

ITServe Governing Board 2026:

ITServe Governing Board 2025:

Raghu Chittimalla – ITServe National President 2021 – ITServe Governing Board 2025 & CEO – Founder: TechStar

LinkedIn Profile Link

TechStar

https://www.techstargroup.com/

Amar (Amareswararao) Varada – ITServe National President 2020 – ITServe Governing Board 2025 and CEO SURYA SYSTEMS INC.

Vinod Babu Uppu – ITServe National President 2019 – ITServe Governing Board 2025

Public records show Vinod Babu Uppu occupying officer or agent roles across more than a dozen IT and holding companies, many sharing the same small office suites and a single residential address. That type of clustering is consistent with multi-entity staffing ecosystems designed to move contracts and workers across different corporate shells. This is a textbook example of industry actors shaping U.S. immigration policy in ways that align with their own high-volume visa pipelines.

Address hubs and shell-style clustering

Hub A: 1303 W Walnut Hill Ln, Irving, TX 75038

Multiple IT consultancies and staffing-style entities at the same small office strip, all visa-active (IBM Global Systems, Horizon Advanced Systems, Intelligroup, Tvarana), with PPP loans and H-1B/PERM filings stacked on top of each other. These entities are individually small but collectively generate a sizable immigration footprint, especially for a single strip-mall address.

Entities:

IBM Global Systems Inc (dba Jolt / Jolt Technologies)
Horizon Advanced Systems Inc
Tvarana Software Solutions LLC
Intelligroup USA Ltd (one of the listed addresses)

Hub B: 4956 N O’Connor Rd, Irving, TX 75062

Mixed portfolio of IT, media (“India Today”), food/retail (“Soul of South”), and tech-branded entities (MuleSoft Connect, TechOne IT, Infosis) anchored to the same address. Suggests a centralized mail / management hub for multiple ventures controlled by overlapping Indian-origin principals.

Entities:

Sri Sreenivasa Infra LLC
Intelligroup USA Ltd
Adviz Technologies Inc
India Today LLC
Soul of South LLC
MuleSoft Connect Inc
TechOne IT LLC
Infosis LLC

Hub C: 4078 Saguaro Ln, Irving, TX 75063 (residential)

Dozens of companies from IT to holdings to food are legally registered to what appears to be a residential address and list Uppu as CEO/CFO/Secretary/Agent across multiple entities. This is very typical of owner-driven multi-entity ecosystems where one person controls many shells on paper.

Entities:

GuideVision, Inc
ARGHA Services Inc
380 Paloma Creek LLC
Sripraja Holdings LLC
Desi Food World LLC
Desi Farm Fresh LLC
Sampradaya Ltd Co
GALLEGA SYSTEMS INC

Cross-border tie: India private company link: Sampradaya Ltd Co in TX is linked by name and registration references to Sampradaya Trading Company Private Limited in India.

Real-estate and investment vehicles: Entities like 380 Paloma Creek LLC, Sripraja Holdings LLC, Lexington Coit 5 LP, Sri Sreenivasa Infra LLC, Sampradaya Ltd Company, etc., indicate a second layer: real-estate and “holdings” vehicles.

This looks like the usual pattern where IT-consulting cashflow gets recycled into local real-estate, farm/food ventures, and cross-border trading companies, with overlapping officers.

Jolt Technologies (DBA of IBM Global) (30) Jolt Technologies: About | LinkedIn | www.joltTech.us

IBM Global Systems::IBM Global Systems Inc::

Awoit Systems AWOIT SYSTEMS

ADVIZ TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Adviz Technologies – Adviz Technologies

GALLEGA SYSTEMS INC. Gallega | Innovative IT Solutions & Software Development

HORIZON ADVANCED SYSTEMS, INC Horizon Advanced System

GuideVision, Inc. (alt. Names: HORIZON ADVANCED SYSTEMS, INC)

Tvarana Software Solutions LLC Tvarana

Devender Aerrabolu – ITServe National President 2022 – ITServe Governing Board 2025 & CEO of Tek Leaders

Vinay Mahajan – ITServe National President 2023- ITServe Governing Board 2025 & CEO/Founder of NAM Info Inc

Jagadeesh Mosali – ITServe National President 2024 – ITServe Governing Board 2025 & CEO of Redbud Technologies

Interview link

Redbud Technologies Link

Anju Vallabhaneni – ITServe National President 2025 – ITServe Governing Board 2025

PPP Refund Link

The onshore offshore model

The new ITServe president, Anju Vallabhaneni, built his business on H-1B dependency, a global labor-import network, and federally documented wage and visa violations. His company has sponsored nearly 1,700 H-1Bs, 98.5% from India, while collecting $3.7 million in forgiven PPP funds. He has a history of legal scrutiny, political influence campaigns and offshore recruiting pipelines that directly contradict ITServe’s public claims of “closing the skills gap.”

Now he is lobbying Congress to double the H-1B cap through the HIRE Act, a bill that would financially benefit the same visa-dependent staffing firms he represents, while pushing American workers further out of the labor market. Americans deserve to know exactly who is writing their immigration policy and whose interests it truly serves.

ITServe Board of Directors 2025

Manohar Kadsagani – ITServe Board of Directors 2025 and Managing Director & CEO, President, Founder – Sainar Solutions

Corporate fingerprint

Bala Shan ITSS – Board of Director (Benefits) & CEO of Lorven Technologies

Lorven Technologies

Srikanth Dasugari ITSS – Board of Directors 2025 & CEO Eminent Software Services

Corporate Footprint

(31) Sivasankar Moopanar | LinkedIn

Gautam Reddy Mallireddy ITSS Board of Directors 2025 & Officer/CEO, Metrix IT Solutions, MSR Technology Group, Synapsis Inc

Mahender Reddy Musuku – ITSS Advisor (Insurance), Board of Directors 2025 & CEO Systech Corp (Systechcorp Inc/Nihaki Systems, Inc), Behired and Co-Founder Smart Management Inc

Shree (Sridhar) Yerramsetti – ITSS Chair, Board of Directors 2025 & CEO-FOUNDER LIBSYS TECHNOLOGIES INC. and American Green Solutions

Libsys Inc Career Page

Mahesh Sake – ITSS Treasurer, Board of Directors 2025 & CEO Cymansys Solutions, Nebule Inc., Anuguna Charitable Group, and Caliber Management

Ravikiran Kemetireddy – ITServe Jt. Treasurer, Board of Directors 2025 and CEO InfoShore Solutions and Neo Prism Solutions

TP Reddy (Prashanth Tallapureddy) – ITSS Chair, Board of Directors 2025 and CEO RaceDog Technologies, 3AmigosIT LLC, Crossroads Food Services, Reddy Holdings, and MORE…

Ramesh Kalwala – ITSS Chair, Board of Directors 2025 and CEO aXseum Inc, PVK Corporation (U.S. & India), NVPV Solutions, Vestoge Ventures and Director/Officer of Indian American Diaspora Association

Sarath Chalamcharla – ITSS Chair, Board of Directors 2025 & CEO/Founder/Officer Airawath, Analytic Era

ITServe Office Bearers 2025

Sivasankar “Siva” Moonpanar – ITServe President Elect. 2025 & CEO of Edify Technologies, Inc.

Edify helps companies enhance technology footprint and gain digital advantage

Edify Technologies

(31) Edify Technologies: Overview | LinkedIn

2025 Leadership – ITServe Alliance

Suresh Potluri (Venekata Suresh Babu Potluri) – ITServe Secretary 2025 & CEO-Founder Quiddity Infotech (U.S. + India) and Officer/Director of Anromeda Solutions, SV IT Services, VS Consulting, Datamind Technologies, 50Two Donations(non-profit)

Anil Atyam – ITServe Joint Secretary 2025 & CEO Founder – Cloud Integrator (Algorithm, Inc)

Cloud Integrator

SAMBA MOVVA – ITServe Treasurer 2025 & CEO, Founder – Lorsiv Technologies

This is Samba Movva: Treasurer of ITServe Alliance, the group that claims it is “empowering local employment.”

Evidence Link

Lorsiv Technologies

LORSIV Technologies Inc.

LORSIV Technologies’ own published materials further corroborate the findings already documented regarding visa dependency, offshore control and exclusionary hiring practices.

Key admissions from company materials:

1. Explicit reliance on India-based labor – LORSIV states it “leverages India’s top engineering talent” and “employs world-class software resources in India” while presenting itself as a U.S. staffing and consulting firm. – This directly confirms offshore sourcing as a core business model, not an incidental support function.

2.Offshore outsourcing framed as risk mitigation

– The company claims U.S.-based project managers exist primarily to “minimize the risks associated with offshore outsourcing,” implicitly acknowledging that the actual workforce is offshore.

– This contradicts representations of domestic staffing and raises material misrepresentation concerns for clients and regulators.

3.Contract-to-hire and staff outsourcing model

– LORSIV describes a system where workers are supplied as contractors or consultants, working “exclusively for a client as if they were that client’s employees,” while LORSIV retains control.

– This structure aligns with labor brokering, not bona fide employment, and raises risks under:

* H-1B employer-employee control rules

* DOL wage and hour standards

* IRS worker classification rules

4. Reduction of employer liabilities as a selling point

– LORSIV openly markets its ability to eliminate “payroll, taxes, liabilities, costs and overheads” for clients.

– This language signals workforce substitution and liability shifting, a hallmark of visa-driven staffing schemes.

Link| Link | Link | Link | Link

These posts are not isolated recruiting ads.. it fits a documented pattern:

Repeated hotlists openly advertising visa status (H-1B, OPT, CPT, GC, H4 EAD)
Visa-dependent consultants marketed for immediate C2C placement, indicating benching and labor brokering
Recruiters operating from India while advertising “US IT staffing” Systematic contract-only pipelines, not bona fide hiring

The email identities do not match the poster’s name (e.g., American-sounding first names used in company emails that differ from the recruiter’s actual identity). This is a known tactic used to mask offshore recruiting operations, bypass scrutiny, and present a false U.S.-based appearance. Taken together, this shows:

Visa dependency
Bench sales behavior
Misrepresentation of recruiter identity
Offshore control of U.S. labor placements

These are classic indicators of labor brokering, visa misuse, and misrepresentation, not lawful recruitment.

ITServe Alliance’s Treasurer runs an H-1B-dependent staffing firm that took $1.13M in PPP funds, funds that explicitly require compliance with federal nondiscrimination laws. Yet the public record shows:

Visa-only recruiting
OPT / H-1B bench sales
100% of employment-based green cards going to Indian-origin workers
Offshore recruiting controlled from India
Systematic exclusion of U.S. workers

PPP recipients certified under penalty of law that they would not discriminate based on citizenship or national origin. Openly operating a nationality-locked labor pipeline while taking taxpayer relief is not a gray area, it directly contradicts PPP eligibility certifications. This isn’t a random member. This is ITServe’s TREASURER. the person responsible for oversight of money, personally tied to conduct that violates the very conditions attached to federal aid.

ITServe 2025 Directors

Muralidhar Bandlapalli – ITServe Director – Bylaws 2025 & CEO – Stek Systems

SteckSystems

Vijay Kommineni- ITServe Director – Chapter Relations 2025 & CEO of Galaxy I Technologies

Galaxy I Technologies

Ram Nandyala – ITServe Director – Contracts/Procurements/Certifications 2025 & Founder & VP of Smart Folks Inc. (U.S. & India) and Tulsi Consulting

Smart Folks Inc.

Shabana Siraj – ITServe Director – Diversity, Women & Compliance 2025 & CEO Trident Consulting

“Finding Diverse Talent: We have helped clients reach their diversity & inclusion goals by fulfilling their demand for a diverse workforce, by finding professionals that meet criteria including, but not limited to gender and ethnicity.”

ITServe repeatedly claims to represent American businesses and American workers. But in a LinkedIn post by ITServe Director Shabana Siraj, in which she tags ITServe, tells a different story. In that post, she praises the proposed $100K H-1B fee specifically because it makes hiring workers in the United States “economically unviable” and accelerates the offshoring of jobs to India. That statement directly contradicts ITServe’s public narrative. ITServe presents itself as an organization serving American economic interests. Yet its own leadership is openly celebrating policies that eliminate U.S. hiring and expand offshore labor operations.

This reaction underscores exactly why the $100K H-1B fee was proposed. The purpose of the policy is to curb abuse of foreign labor programs and force companies to hire Americans first.. not to subsidize foreign labor pipelines or incentivize offshoring. When an ITServe director responds by framing the fee as a reason to move jobs to India instead of hiring U.S. workers, it becomes an admission. For ITServe and many of its member companies, hiring Americans is not the default. The default response to accountability is offshoring, a model they already operate through established onshore-offshore labor pipelines tied to India.

What this messaging reveals: • The fee threatens their core business model • Americans are priced out, not prioritized • U.S. jobs are shifted offshore by design • India is the intended beneficiary • “Innovation” and “global talent” are used to mask labor displacement This is not a misunderstanding or a policy disagreement. It is a public statement of intent. An organization whose leadership applauds the removal of U.S. workers from the labor market cannot credibly claim to represent American businesses or American workers.

Marvel Technologies | EmployEZ

Prasad Arikatla – ITServe Director – Membership 2025 & CEO-Founder Ruri Software Technologies, DESI DISTRICT LLC, RURI HOLDINGS LLC, PVMR HOLDINGS LLC, IT ELEMENTS LLC, FAMOUS TECHNOLOGIES INC, PARK INVESTORS LLC, CapStone Realty Prosper LLC

Sateesh Nagilla – ITServe National Treasurer (2024) – ITServe Director PAC & Immigration 2025

RAMESH BABU GARLAPATI – ITServe Chair – PR & Media and CEO of Globex IT Solutions USA

Globex IT Solutions USA

Evidence Link | Link | Link | Link | Link

Sharad Patney – ITserve Director – Speakers 2025 & CEO of VLink Inc.

VLink Inc.

Vinay Parachuri – ITserve Director – Sponsorship 2025 & CEO, Pharmatek Solutions

Pharmatek Solutions

Bala Rajaraman – ITserve Director – Technology 2025 & CEO, Marvel Technologies Inc. and EmployEZ

Advisory Directors

Radha Alla – ITServe Advisory Director Executive Board 2025 & CEO, Kodefast/Nimble Staffing/Hall Mark Global Technologies/eSigns.io/PERFORMANCE RESOURCES NY INC/TechOne IT/Niktor/ScaleneWorks People Solutions/Aavalar Consulting/RK Technical Services/Spruce Health Pro/Eforce Digital/HCR Group, Inc.

ITServe Chapter Presidents

Suman Kota – ITServe Boston Chapter President and CEO/Officer/Director of Ventois Inc., LORVEN CONSULTANTS, INC.
CHATEAU REALTY, L.L.C., QUASENT INC., DEYRAI LLC, AGAPE RESTAURANT GROUP LLC, S2V LLC, SV TRADERS LLC, AYODHYARAM LLC, SARVIN ANALYTICS LLC, UTILITIES ANALYST LLC, SAI SCRIPTS LLC, R8 GROUP LLC, HEYDU SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED (India), DASHAKARA ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED (India), VENTOIS SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED (India), NEUSKALE INC., VIEW PHARMACY, LLC, ASRK LLC, WAVESOFT SOLUTIONS INC, INNOVIM TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC., SUKANDA LLC, Mangiare LLC, TRESTELLAE INC, VALORIN INC, QuantiPeak

Jayasekhar Talluri (Jay Talluri): Partner/Co-Founder with Radha Alla & ITServe Platinum Member

Hallmark Global

Rise IT Solutions/ iTech US, Inc./ 7T.aI /Smart Works

Niktor

ScaleneWorks People Solutions

Nimble Staffing

eSigns.io

Kishore Khandavalli- ITServe Advisory Director PAC 2025 & CEO RiseIT Solutions, 7T(SevenTablets), Goldstone Technologies, Primesoft, P5 Analytics, Pine Computers, Inc., Valuify,LLC, R88, Inc, Fit Freedom LLC, Minscrip Inc., Innovation Fund LLC, Smart Works LLC and ITech US, Inc.

Corporate Footprint

ITServe Chapter Presidents 2025

Mallik Medarametla – Atlanta & CEO Samprasoft and IntelliGen Technologies Inc.

ITServe 2025 Chairs

Dasarath Kunapaneni – ITServe Chair Mediation 2025 and CEO of Unicom

Unicom Technologies

UNICOM

PPP Refunds Link | Link

Unicom Link

Link | Link | Link | Link

Venkat Maram – ITServe 2025 Chair – Audit & Finance Control & CEO/Officer of EMPOWER TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS INC, SMART, INFOTECH INC, Bartronics America Inc., CLOUDEEVA, INC., DEXTRO SOFTWARE SYSTEMS, INC. changed to: WIZCOM CORPORATION

Kanal Sakamuri- ITServe 2025 Chair – Benefits & CEO/Officer of Kaizen Technologies, EESHA TECH SOLUTIONS INC, SSS ENERGY INC., SYNERGY GREEN GROUP LLC, PRAMAD INFOTECH LLC, KAIZEN SOFT TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED (India), SMART DATA SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS LLC, EESHA ESTATES LLC

ITServe CPAC Chairs 2025

https://itserve.org/cpac-leadership-2025/

Hima Kolanagireddy – ITServe Board of Director, CPAC Chair & CEO Ascii Group LLC & Republican National Committee: RNC National Commiteewoman & Michigan Republican Party – Precinct Delegate

LinkedIn Profile Link

Link Link | Link

Testimony Link

Evidence Link | Link | Link

Ascii Group

VirtueS | IT Consulting, Staffing & Digital Transformation

Link | Link | Link

Arvind Nerella – ITServe Board of Directors

LinkedIn Profile: Link

Virtue Serve (VirtueS)

Evidence Link | Link

Offshore/India Connection:

Dil Vasa – ITServe Florida Chapter Secretary

This piece by Dil Vasa is not neutral analysis. It is a defensive narrative written from the perspective of an IT staffing executive whose business model is directly affected by increased scrutiny of visa abuse, body-shopping and third-party labor arbitrage. The tone (“objectively and respectfully”) masks what is essentially damage control for firms that rely on foreign labor pipelines rather than direct U.S. hiring.

The author openly acknowledges:

“Less competition from unethical firms”
“Tighter regulations reduce the operations of body shops”

This is an admission, not a complaint. If regulation harms your business, your business depended on regulatory gaps. The article treats the collapse of body shops as collateral damage instead of what it actually is: the policy objective.

False distinction: “trusted vendors” vs. body shops

Vasa tries to draw a line between:

“Unethical body shops” and
“Trusted vendors”

But this distinction collapses under scrutiny because:

The business model is identical (bench labor, visa dependency, third-party placement)
Only the compliance sophistication differs
Both rely on foreign labor substitution, not domestic workforce development

This is a rebranding strategy, not reform.

Dil Vasa on top of serving as secretary for the ITServe Florida chapter is also a leader in an organization tied to a specific region of India that exports tech workers to the U.S.

Telangana is not a neutral geographic reference in U.S. tech staffing: Telangana is a major exporter of IT labor.

Hyderabad is a hub for: Offshore delivery centers Body-shop feeder networks H-1B, OPT, and L-1 pipelines. Many ITServe member firms and staffing companies recruit heavily from this region. Serving on the board of a Telangana-specific U.S. association while: Advocating for visa expansion and running a visa-only staffing operation creates a structural alignment of interests, not a coincidence.

(20) Stacklogy Inc.: Overview | LinkedIn

ITServe Alliance Members

Dinesh Movva – ITServe CSR National Secretary and CEO Torque Technologies LLC & Credent Technologies

Ramu Venigandla – ITServe Alliance Member

Eficens Solutions

https://www.eficens.ai/

Staxa Technologies

Stacklogy Inc

Magtech Consulting & Solutions

https://www.magtechcorp.com/

Staffingly’s Website | LinkedIn Page

ITServe Member Companies

Apex CoVantage LLC

With ITServe Alliance Member branding, Apex describes their company as having approximately 50 employees in the U.S. and 1,500 in India.

HCL Global Systems, Inc

HCL Global Systems Inc admits they leverage their onsite-offshore delivery model to provide the best ROI for their clients. This is enabled by hiring foreign workers to work in the U.S. for their “Onsite” workers who manage the workers back in India.

Dan Nandan (YASHODA DEVAKI NANDAN): ITServe Member and CEO of Staffingly, Hotvisas.com, Hire IT People Inc (U.S. & India), HotSkills.com, SHREE YASHODA NANDAN LLC, Immisupport, Infoway Software, IT Cats, LLC.

History with ITServe Alliance

Staffingly

Immisupport.com| LinkedIn Page

Immisupport

HIRE IT People

Infoway Software

Dan Nandan – The Immigration Guru

ITServe Member Directory 2016

The Ecosystem

ITServe Sponsors

TrackEx – MSR

ITServe Alliance 2026 Rebranding

ITServe Immigration: Visa dependent labor model

Additional ITServe evidence

Political influence bought and paid for by money gained from the displacement of American workers

Evidence linked may no longer be available due to ITServe taking it down from public view. Link

Link to article | Link to interview with Dave Brat

U.S. Senator John Cornyn – Texas

Congressman Rich McCormick

U.S. Senator Cory Booker – New Jersey

U.S. Senator Jon HustedLink

Representative Kristin RobbinsLink

U.S. Senator Eric Pratt – MinnesotaLink

U.S. Senator John Kennedy – Louisiana

U.S. House Representative Shri Thanedar – Michigan

U.S. Governor Gretchen Whitmer Link

U.S. Senator Mark Warner -Virginia

U.S. Governor Greg Abbott – Texas

U.S. Representative Tim Moore Link

U.S. Senator Flavio Bravo – Arizona

ITServe Member Benefits Cont.

Integrated Tax and Compliance Services for Foreign Accounts

ITServe – RAVES Partnership

Additional ITServe evidence

Historical ITServe Website Archive: