Read Hanne’s The Herland Report.
The geopolitical landscape of the Middle East is experiencing a historic transformation marked by the intentional erosion of the Strait of Hormuz’s strategic significance. It also signifies an aggressive economic isolation of Iran and a shift away from British control of the international naval trade.
On Aug. 19, President Donald Trump announced on Truth Social “the most crushing economic operation ever taken against any country. This will be economic warfare and isolation on an unprecedented scale … any country that allows its financial institutions, businesses, airports, or government entities to provide any type of lifeline to Iran will itself face tremendous economic consequences. Oil smuggling, swap lines, cash transfers, exchange houses, ship registries, front companies – It all needs to stop now. You know who you are.”
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Energy Secretary Chris Wright recently pointed out that the Strait of Hormuz as a geopolitical choke point and vulnerable maritime route is rapidly diminishing.
“The strait is never going back to the way it was,” Bessent said. “What we are going to see over the next two years is that the strait is going to become irrelevant.”
“The economic isolation that Bessent spoke of is the final phase of a strategy that he’s been carrying out since March 2025,” Susan Kokinda points out at Promethean Action. The economic sanctions target Iranian financial networks, including crypto wallets and international assets. This “isolate and strangle” strategy also aims to defund Iran’s regional proxies without the need for direct military confrontation.
The campaign involves alternative oil production and transport routes and a renewed focus on nuclear energy to achieve energy independence. The Gulf states’ expanding oil production beyond OPEC quotas, U.S. engagement in Venezuelan oil production, and new pipelines bypassing the strait together, signal a deliberate effort to decentralize and secure energy flows. It also enhances the sovereignty of Gulf producers. This regionalism contrasts sharply with past external impositions rooted in the Cold War era of a steady flow of Middle East conflicts, Kokinda highlights.
Iran has lost significant control over the Strait of Hormuz, writes CNN. Over 80% of liquids that have passed the strait over the past two weeks have done so via the Omani route, the remaining liquids have been “dark” transits, passing in the dark without transponders. In addition, over 6 million barrels are diverted via existing pipelines, and more are being built.Combined oil transits now total around 15 million barrels per day, before the war it was around 20 million barrels.
This realignment demonstrates the regional countries’ new economic paradigm, based on sovereign nation-state collaboration with the U.S. administration, committed to rewriting the rules of regional engagement. None of the Middle Eastern nations particularly like the idea of becoming subordinates to Iran, having to pay tolls for passing the Hormuz, which mainly delivers energy supplies from the Arab States and Iran to India, China and Southeast Asia.
For example, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), one of Iran’s key economic lifelines, recently suspended all commercial activities and financial transactions with Iran. This severs one of Tehran’s most significant commercial links, thereby effectively cutting off Iran’s imports, which are estimated to be valued at approximately $21 billion, according to Fox News.
The American engagement marks a spectacular halt to the 300-year-old British imperial globalist geopolitical system centered on controlling the world’s naval chokepoints. It announces a new dawn for sovereign nations and the rise of a much more conflict free Middle East, which may boom economically, spearheaded by President Trump’s America. For over a century, the City of London’s financial hegemony – the British empire’s financial weapon – has strategically utilized the Strait of Hormuz as a pivotal point of leverage to regulate global energy flows, arguably deliberately causing regional instability. By keeping the Middle East as a region in constant conflict, playing one group against another, the regional nations have remained weak and easily exploited, characterized by internal strife.
Many have profited. For example, Lloyd’s of London, a leading insurance market, has greatly benefited from the instability by offering insurance for shipping through the Hormuz. The steady tensions with Iran have led to increases in premiums, benefiting the U.K.’s financial interests. London’s historical control over global maritime trade insurance is now challenged directly by the U.S. Development Finance Corporation replacing Lloyd’s. It marks a new tone from a strengthened U.S. under “America First,” which does not want to play third fiddle anymore, as explained by Bessent in April 2026. The U.S. quest for world energy dominance under the leadership of President Trump is very evident. It puts America First.
