The administration of President Donald Trump has revealed in federal court the leftist propaganda that a leftist judge has ordered put back in national parks.
One “junior ranger” book for children, for example, blasts “white enslavers” and another condemns “European colonists.”
And a prominent commentary website has noted that such rulings actually are “crippling” the U.S. Constitution.
It is the Washington Examiner that carried the details the Trump administration delivered to U.S. District Judge Angel Kelley, an appointee picked by the far-left Democrat Joe Biden.
Kelley ordered materials removed under Trump’s executive order barring “corrosive ideology” that Biden had installed at National Park Service properties to be put back.
The anti-“white enslavers” reference was at the Fort Raleigh National Historic Site in North Carolina and the anti-“European colonists” appeared at Buck Island Reef National Monument.
BREAKING: Judge Angel Kelley blocks Interior Sec. Doug Burgum’s “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History” Order as “a dangerous precedent of censorship and sanitization” and orders DOI to “restore and reinstall” removed materials “forthwith.”
ORDER:… pic.twitter.com/VShTGBOiZ1
— Chris “Law Dork” Geidner (@chrisgeidner) June 12, 2026
@dojphofficial Judge Angel Kelley of Massachusetts recent decision is yet another case of an activist judge essentially legislating against the Trump administration. The DOI said that Kelley is a “liberal activist judge” in a statement to Fox News, adding that the agency is…
— klsparrow (@klsparrow2) June 17, 2026
“The Trump administration told the court that most of the removed material was disparaging to ‘Americans past or living,’ including an exhibit at the First State National Historical Park in Delaware about Founding Father Caesar Rodney, which described him as someone who enslaved others when discussing his role in the American Revolution,” the report said.
The Department of Justice listed for Kelley, who had demanded the information, 57 items that disparaged Americans but will be restored under Kelley’s order, although a time frame wasn’t certain.
One is at Acadia National Park in Maine where two signs referenced climate change and Native Americans. At Theodore Roosevelt Island a sign discussed the “racial aspects” of his policies.
Kelley has claimed that removing the insults and defamations was “a dangerous precedent of censorship and sanitization.”
Trump’s officials said they were editing materials to remove “politically charged matters.”
It is at the Federalist where a commentary warned about the threat from judicial activism, as is common among pro-Democrat, anti-Trump judges these days.
One, for example, continues to rule against Trump even though he has a clear conflict of interest: a wife who is active in opposing and pushing hate against Truimp.
In the federal judiciary now, the commentary said, “a significant number of ‘“judges’ have flipped separation of powers on its head. While supposed to perform in an objective manner, these rogue actors have greenlit leftists’ lawfare against the Trump administration and Republicans by issuing overreaching orders — many of which have little basis in the Constitution or law.”
The commentary cited Kelley for ordering the restoration of “left-wing narratives about LGBT ideology, climate alarmism” and more.
Then there’s a Massachusetts judge, Richard Stearns, who unilaterally halted Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s lawsuit against ActBlue. The major Democrat-aligned “fundraising platform is currently facing scrutiny over allegations of accepting contributions from foreign nationals and other corrupt activities,” the commentary said.
Stearns, chosen by Bill Clinton, used “pure speculation” in a supposedly “neutral” decision.
“Writing as if he were an ActBlue employee, he regurgitated the fundraising platform’s claim that Paxton’s statements as a candidate criticizing ActBlue are proof that his suit was ‘filed in retaliation for (and in an attempt to suppress) ActBlue’s efforts’ to support Paxton’s Senate opponent, James Talarico,” the commentary said.
“Paxton’s public statements in the wake of filing the case against ActBlue reveal his true motivation,” Stearns actually claimed. “While a prosecutor is entitled to a large degree of prosecutorial discretion and has a right to make a considered public accounting of his actions, Paxton did not hesitate in drawing a connection between the lawsuit and his candidacy for Senate.”
Then there’s a Joe Biden-picked judge in Idaho who blocked a law requiring individuals to use the restroom that corresponds with their sex.
The commentary noted, “It’s actually rogue judges (like those documented in this article) who are pushing America toward a crisis by forgoing their sworn duty to apply the law in an objective manner. If the judiciary refuses to operate within the limits enacted by the Constitution, then why should the other branches? And why should the people and their representatives respect the courts’ judgments if they’re continuously based on anything but the law?”
