‘I might be praying in my head’: Judge foreshadows uphill climb for prosecutors targeting woman for her ‘mere presence’

A judge in the United Kingdom has allowed prosecutors who are trying to convict a woman for standing and praying outside a medical center to correct their charges against her, which he determined were “not properly drafted.”

But he still foreshadowed an uphill climb for the prosecution against the woman, who previously won her battle against similar charges, and even won a cash settlement of thousands of dollars.

It was Judge Tan Ikram in Birmingham who pointed out the prosecution charges against Isabel Vaughan-Spruce failed because the law under which they were filed required an “act,” which was not included.

He allowed prosecutors to correct their mistake, and Vaughan pleaded innocent, but the judge still noted, “Standing is not a crime. … It doesn’t matter how many times you do it, mere presence is not enough.”

He said at issue will be whether she had the requisite intent to violate the law, which bars “influencing” someone regarding an abortion.

Vaughan-Spruce is appearing in Birmingham Magistrates’ Court with a trial set for next year.

Her defense lawyers have argued that her human rights have been breached and prosecutors are punishing her by abusing the process itself. They cite Articles 9 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

She is accused of “standing and silently praying outside an abortion facility in Birmingham.” Authorities claim she violated a buffer zone law that bans anyone from “influencing any person’s decision” regarding abortion.

The counts stem from her actions in 2025 in West Midlands, where police said she was suspected of breaking the law.

Actually, ADF International confirmed she has been peacefully praying in the same public area for years.

Her lawyers say silent prayer and a “mere presence” are outside the scope of the buffer zone law, and further, Parliament cannot interfere with the absolute rights to freedom of thought and to hold a religious belief.

“I am deeply troubled by this violation of the basic right to my own thoughts and to my deeply-held Christian pro-life convictions,” she said.

Her lawyer, Jeremiah Igunnubole, warned, “To criminally charge someone simply for holding a certain belief within a certain location amounts to thought policing, which has no place in a democratic society.”

He pointed out since harassment and abusive behavior already are separate offenses, the new agenda is being used “to punish those engaged in peaceful conduct for nothing other than what they think or believe.”

It’s not the woman’s first go-round with such a leftist agenda. She was arrested in 2023, twice, on similar claims by prosecutors, but she was acquitted, and when she challenged the police actions she receied a settlement of thousands of dollars.

Bob Unruh

Bob Unruh joined WND in 2006 after nearly three decades with the Associated Press, as well as several Upper Midwest newspapers, where he covered everything from legislative battles and sports to tornadoes and homicidal survivalists. He is currently a news editor for the WND News Center, and also a photographer whose scenic work has been used commercially. Read more of Bob Unruh's articles here.


Leave a Comment